employment status
-
Update - Furlough: the challenges ahead
Updated article: David Reade QC and Daniel Northall from Littletons examine some of the legal and practical challenges which employers face in connection with the Government’s Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme.
- news
30/03/2020 12:20
-
Furlough: the challenges ahead
David Reade QC and Daniel Northall from Littletons examine some of the legal and practical challenges which employers face in connection with the Government’s Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme.
- news
27/03/2020 10:50
-
Patel v Specsavers Optical Group Ltd UKEAT/0286/18/JOJ
Appeal against the ET’s finding that the Claimant was not an employee of the Respondent. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
20/02/2020 14:19
-
Digital Communication Systems Ltd v Scully UKEAT/0182/19/LA
Appeal against the ET’s decision that that the Claimant was a “limb (b)” worker for the purposes of employment legislation. Appeal allowed.
- cases
03/02/2020 17:36
-
Augustine v Econnect Cars Ltd UKEAT/0231/18/OO
Appeal against the ET’s findings that the Claimant was a “worker” but not an “employee”, that the Claimant was not a “part-time worker” and that the Claimant’s treatment at the end of the relationship was not for any prohibited reason. Appeal allowed in part.
- cases
03/01/2020 15:41
-
Stuart Delivery Ltd v Augustine UKEAT/0219/18/BA
Appeal against the ET’s finding that the Claimant was not an employee of the Respondent but that, under certain arrangements, he was a “worker” of the Respondent. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
13/12/2019 17:41
-
Hancock v Ter-Berg and another UKEAT/0138/19/BA
Appeal against the ET’s decision on the Claimant’s interim relief application before his employment status was conclusively determined. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
12/11/2019 10:50
-
October 2019 Online Update Course
This month's 12 questions are based on a Supreme Court case relating to the employment status of judges and a Court of Appeal case relating to race discrimination.
- resources
28/10/2019 18:28
-
Gilham v Ministry of Justice [2019] UKSC 44
Appeal against the Court of Appeal’s findings that the Appellant was not a “worker” and that denying her whistle-blowing protection was not discrimination in the enjoyment of her right to freedom of expression and thus contrary to Article 14 of the ECHR read with Article 10. Appeal allowed.
- cases
16/10/2019 15:04
-
Community Based Care Health Ltd v Narayan UKEAT/0162/18/JOJ
Appeal against the ET’s decision that the Claimant was a “worker” within s 230(3)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996 (“ERA”) and was not an “employee” under s 230(1) ERA. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
11/09/2019 10:52
