employment status
-
Uber B.V. ("UBV") & Ors v Aslam & Ors [2018] EWCA Civ 2748
Appeal against decision that the claimants in the ET were workers and so entitled to protection under the National Minimum Wage Act and the Working Time Directive. Appeal dismissed by a majority: Lord Underhill dissented.
- cases
20/12/2018 10:14
https://www.employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed36468
-
Addison Lee Ltd v Lange & Ors UKEAT/0037/18/BA
Appeal against a ruling that the Claimant's were limb (b) workers and that, as such, they were entitled to holiday pay and to the national minimum wage; also against a ruling that time when the drivers were logged on to the Respondent's system, other than break times, was working time. Both appeals dismissed.
- cases
15/11/2018 13:40
-
Leyland & Ors v Hermes ET/1800575/2017
An EJ has ruled that couriers for Hermes are limb (b) workers within the meaning of s230(2)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996, regulation 2(1) Working Time Regulations 1998 and s 54(3)(b) National Minimum Wage Act 1998.
- cases
20/07/2018 15:28
-
Hafal Ltd v Lane-Angell UKEAT/0107/17/JOJ
Appeal against a ruling that the Claimant was an employee of the Respondent. Appeal allowed.
- cases
25/06/2018 09:11
-
Gunny v Great Ormond Street for Children NHS Foundation Trust & Ors UKEAT/0241/17/DA
Appeal against a finding that the Claimant was not employed by the Second Respondent. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
14/06/2018 16:41
-
Pimlico Plumbers Ltd & Anor v Smith [2018] UKSC 29
Appeal against a decision that the Claimant was a limb (b) worker within the meaning of s230(3) of the ERA 1996 and therefore could pursue his claims of unlawful deductions, holiday pay and disability discrimination. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
13/06/2018 11:00
-
Addison Lee Ltd v Gascoigne UKEAT/0289/17/LA
Appeal against a finding that the Claimant cycle courier was a worker within the meaning of Regulation 2 of the Working Time Regulations and in consequence was entitled to holiday pay. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
15/05/2018 11:04
-
Unfair dismissal - Case Round-Up: April 2018
In this month's round-up, Mark Shulman, consultant solicitor with Keystone Law, looks at a round-up of recent unfair dismissal cases on employment status, interim relief and conduct.
- resources
09/04/2018 16:56
-
Nayak v Lucent Advisors (UK) Ltd (Debarred) & Anor UKEAT/0154/17/LA
Appeal against a judgment that ruled that the Claimant was not an employee of either the First or Second Respondent and that accordingly his claim for unfair dismissal must be dismissed. Appeal also against a finding that he did not have the requisite two year period of continuous employment by either Respondent. Appeal allowed and remitted to a fresh Tribunal.
- cases
19/02/2018 13:15
-
Blakely v On-Site Recruitment Solutions Ltd & Heritage Solutions Ltd (Debarred) UKEAT/0134/17/DA
Appeal against a finding that the Claimant was neither a worker nor an employee of the First Respondent. Appeal allowed and remitted to a fresh Tribunal.
- cases
26/01/2018 10:09
