employment status
-
Bannerman v Euroscot Engineering Ltd UKEATS/0010/19/AT
Appeal against the ET’s finding that the Claimant was not an employee of the Respondent. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
29/09/2020 17:44
-
Varnish v British Cycling Federation (t/a British Cycling) UKEAT/0022/20/LA
Appeal against the ET’s finding that the Claimant was not an employee of the Respondent or a worker. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
21/07/2020 16:12
-
EMERGENCY CHANGES TO INSOLVENCY LAW DURING CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC
David Reade QC and Alexander Halban from Littletons examine the proposed changes and some of the issues which need to be worked out in the emergency legislation.
- news
31/03/2020 14:12
-
CORONAVIRUS JOB RETENTION SCHEME: THE PLIGHT OF THE PUBLIC SECTOR
David Reade QC and Daniel Northall provide a third update on the Government’s Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme. This update should be read in conjunction with the first and second updates published on 26 and 27 March 2020 respectively.
- news
30/03/2020 12:24
-
Update - Furlough: the challenges ahead
Updated article: David Reade QC and Daniel Northall from Littletons examine some of the legal and practical challenges which employers face in connection with the Government’s Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme.
- news
30/03/2020 12:20
-
Furlough: the challenges ahead
David Reade QC and Daniel Northall from Littletons examine some of the legal and practical challenges which employers face in connection with the Government’s Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme.
- news
27/03/2020 10:50
-
Patel v Specsavers Optical Group Ltd UKEAT/0286/18/JOJ
Appeal against the ET’s finding that the Claimant was not an employee of the Respondent. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
20/02/2020 14:19
-
Digital Communication Systems Ltd v Scully UKEAT/0182/19/LA
Appeal against the ET’s decision that that the Claimant was a “limb (b)” worker for the purposes of employment legislation. Appeal allowed.
- cases
03/02/2020 17:36
-
Augustine v Econnect Cars Ltd UKEAT/0231/18/OO
Appeal against the ET’s findings that the Claimant was a “worker” but not an “employee”, that the Claimant was not a “part-time worker” and that the Claimant’s treatment at the end of the relationship was not for any prohibited reason. Appeal allowed in part.
- cases
03/01/2020 15:41
-
Stuart Delivery Ltd v Augustine UKEAT/0219/18/BA
Appeal against the ET’s finding that the Claimant was not an employee of the Respondent but that, under certain arrangements, he was a “worker” of the Respondent. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
13/12/2019 17:41