employment status
-
Sejpal v Rodericks Dental Limited [2022] EAT 91
Appeal against a finding that the Claimant was not a worker. Appeal allowed.
- cases
15/08/2022 09:39
-
Waters v The Mote Cricket Club (an uncorporated members association) [2022] EAT 28
Appeal against finding that the claimant was not an employee or a worker, primarily on Meek grounds
- cases
27/02/2022 13:53
-
Smith v Pimlico Plumbers Ltd [2022] EWCA Civ 70
Appeal against decisions that the Claimant was not denied his right to "paid annual leave" under regulation 13 WTR and that he had not made a claim for holiday pay for leave that was not actually taken. Appeal allowed in part.
- cases
07/02/2022 11:42
-
Johnson v Transopco UK Ltd EA-2020-000780-AT
Appeal against an ET decision that the Claimant was not a worker. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
20/01/2022 12:39
-
Stojsavljevic & Turner v DPD Group UK Ltd EA-2019-000259-JOJ
Appeal against finding in the ET that the claimants, who both operated parcel delivery franchises, were not employees or workers.
- cases
04/01/2022 12:24
-
Rainford v Dorset Aquatics Ltd EA-2020-000123-BA
Appeal against a finding that the Claimant was neither an “employee” nor a “worker” for the purposes of section 230 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and that his claims against the Respondent company for unfair dismissal, unpaid wages, notice pay and holiday pay were therefore unsustainable. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
15/12/2021 17:24
-
Main v SpaDental Ltd EA-2020-000023-AT
Appeal against a finding that the Claimant was not a worker. Appeal allowed.
- cases
03/12/2021 14:03
-
Stuart Delivery Ltd v Augustine [2021] EWCA Civ 1514
Appeal against an EAT ruling which agreed with the ET that the Claimant was a worker. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
25/10/2021 14:50
-
Nursing and Midwifery Council v Somerville UKEAT/0258/20/RN
Appeal against the ET’s finding that the Claimant was a worker. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
20/05/2021 11:54
-
Addison Lee Ltd v Lange & Ors [2021] EWCA Civ 594
Following the Supreme Court decision in Uber, Addison Lee have been refused permission to appeal against the decision that the Claimant drivers were workers for the purposes of the Employment Rights Act 1996, Working Time Regulations 1998 and the National Minimum Wage Act 1998.
- cases
23/04/2021 12:18
