employment status
-
Pimlico Plumbers & Anor v Smith [2017] EWCA Civ 51
Appeal against decision that the claimant, who was claiming for disbaility discirmination, was a worker rather than self-employed. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
10/02/2017 11:57
-
Government publishes results of its employment status review
In short, it's complicated.
- news
10/02/2017 09:55
-
Gilham v Ministry of Justice UKEAT0087/16/LA
Appeal against a decision that a District Judge, who it was agreed was an office-holder, was not a worker within the meaning of s.230(3) Employment Rights Act 1996. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
01/11/2016 14:05
-
Aslam, Farrar and Others v Uber 2202551/2015 & Others
Judgment concerning whether the claimants are self employed or employed as workers as they claimed. It was found that the claimants were workers and so due adjusted pay under the National Minimum Wages Regulations
- cases
30/10/2016 10:27
-
Farmer v Heart of Birmingham Teaching Primary Care Trust & Ors UKEAT/0180/15/LA
Appeal against a finding that the Claimant, at all the material times, was not an employee of the Trust but of the Council and that he therefore could not claim unfair dismissal or a redundancy payment against the Trust; nor against the Third Respondent, the Secretary of State for Health, who would have inherited liability for unfair dismissal compensation or any redundancy payment if the Trust had been under any such liability. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
17/05/2016 14:04
-
Suhail v Barking, Havering & Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust & Anor UKEAT/0536/13/RN
Appeal against the dismissal of the claimant's claim of whistleblowing detriment because he was neither an employer nor a worker. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
15/06/2015 11:41
-
Smith v Carillion (JM) Ltd [2015] EWCA Civ 209
Appeal against an EAT decision, which upheld the ET ruling that there was no contract at all in existence between the claimant and the respondent company as end user. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
01/05/2015 10:29
-
Sharpe v The Bishop of Worcester [2015] EWCA Civ 399
Appeal by claimant, a vicar, arguing that he was a worker and could therefore bring claims of unfair dismissal and detriment arising from protected disclosures. Appeal dismissed as the ET had been right to find that the claimant was not a worker and there was no employment contract in place. Therefore he had not passed the threshold to bring a claim.
- cases
01/05/2015 09:10
-
CLFIS (UK) Ltd V Reynolds [2015] EWCA Civ 439
Appeal by respondent against decision to remit claims for unfair dismissal and direct age discrimination to the ET. Appeal dimissed.
- cases
01/05/2015 08:48
-
Office of Tax Simplification publishes proposals to simplify tax and employment status
Report published ooking into ideas for simplifying tax rules
- news
03/03/2015 14:59
