detriment
-
Aliyu v Tesco Stores Ltd [2024] EAT 185
Appeal against the dismissal of the Claimant's claims of victimisation, protected disclosures and harassment. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
02/01/2025 14:03
-
Durey v (1) South Central Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust (2) Protect (Intervenor) [2024] EAT 173
Appeal and cross-appeal arising from whistleblowing claims
- cases
21/11/2024 15:49
-
Moghaddam v University of Oxford Chancellor, Masters and Scholars [2024] EAT 156
Appeal against the dismissal of the Claimant's claims including detriment suffered as a result of making protected disclosures and procedural unfair dismissal. Appeal allowed on two grounds.
- cases
28/10/2024 11:16
-
Erhard-Jensen Ltd v Rogerson [2024] EAT 135
Appeal against a finding that Judicial Proceedings Immunity did not apply to a pleaded detriment. Appeal allowed.
- cases
13/09/2024 09:05
-
Barnett v H & H Gelato Ltd & Ors [2024] EAT 62
Appeal against 3 deposit orders made against the Claimant. Appeal allowed in part.
- cases
28/06/2024 14:40
-
Edinboro v Jamma Umoja (Residential Services) Ltd [2024] EAT 61
Appeal against the striking out of the Claimant's claims. Appeal allowed.
- cases
22/06/2024 14:28
-
First Great Western Limited v Moussa [2024] EAT 82
Appeal against a finding that the Respondent victimised the Claimant for having done a protected act and subjected him to detriments for having made protected disclosures. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
21/06/2024 10:08
-
Kealy v Westfield Community Development Association [2023] EAT 96
Appeal against ET's decision to dismiss claims involving alleged protected disclosures
- cases
11/08/2023 14:56
-
Ejvet v Genesis Education Trust [2022] EAT 75
Appeal against the dismissal of the Claimant's claims of unfair dismissal, disability, discrimination and detriment for having made public interest disclosures. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
09/06/2022 09:28
-
Hepburn v Crown Prosecution Service: [2022] EAT 24
Appeal concerning whether the tribunal had properly considered the detriments relied on by the claimant and in particular whether the tribunal had given sufficient reasons for its findings that there was no victimisation.
- cases
01/03/2022 18:46
