Aliyu v Tesco Stores Ltd [2024] EAT 185
Appeal against the dismissal of the Claimant's claims of victimisation, protected disclosures and harassment. Appeal dismissed.
The Claimant had made various claims against the Respondent including victimisation, protected disclosures and harassment. The ET dismissed his claims saying that the Respondent's conduct did not amount to detriments nor to less favourable treatment because of the Claimant’s race. For the same reasons the ET concluded that none of the conduct complained of amounted to unwanted conduct related to the Claimant’s race. The protected disclosure complaint was rejected for the same reason. The Claimant appealed.
The EAT dismissed the appeal. Despite some infelicities of expression, the ET did not err in law in its determination of complaints of victimisation, harassment and protected disclosure detriment and dismissal.
Published: 02/01/2025 14:03