cases
-
Frewer v Google UK Limited and Others [2022] EAT 34
Appeal concerning naming of clients of the respondent in documents sought for disclosure at ET proceedings.
- cases
24/03/2022 10:12
-
King v Gemalto UK Ltd [2022] EAT 29
Appeal against decision that a claim was out of time whether the claimant argued that his union had not told him of the time limit.
- cases
21/03/2022 13:34
-
Warburton v The Chief Constable of Northamptonshire Police: [2022] EAT 42
Appeal by claimant from a liability decision of the Employment Tribunal which decided that his claim of victimisation was not well-founded. The respondent also appealed a costs award.
- cases
20/03/2022 13:54
-
Harris v East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust [2022] EAT 41
Appeal against ET’s rejection of a claim for constructive dismissal.
- cases
16/03/2022 14:10
-
Her Majesty's Attorney General v Mr David Taheri: [2022] EAT 35
Application for a restrictions of proceedings order where the respondent had made over 40 claims in the ET since 2012.
- cases
08/03/2022 12:25
-
Sun Mark Ltd and Others v Ms Ramandeep Kaur [2022] EAT 32
Appeals against findings made by the ET in victimisation, harassment and discrimination proceedings.
- cases
08/03/2022 08:01
-
Fentem v Outform EMEA Ltd: [2022] EAT 36
Appeal against decision that the ET was bound to conclude the claimant was not dismissed when his employers terminated his employment early during his notice period.
- cases
07/03/2022 17:29
-
Hepburn v Crown Prosecution Service: [2022] EAT 24
Appeal concerning whether the tribunal had properly considered the detriments relied on by the claimant and in particular whether the tribunal had given sufficient reasons for its findings that there was no victimisation.
- cases
01/03/2022 18:46
-
Hesketh v Glasgow Caledonian University [2022] EAT 33
Appeal against refusal to allow, at a preliminary hearing, the claimant to introduce equal pay claims.
- cases
01/03/2022 17:51
-
Waters v The Mote Cricket Club (an uncorporated members association) [2022] EAT 28
Appeal against finding that the claimant was not an employee or a worker, primarily on Meek grounds
- cases
27/02/2022 13:53
