cases
-
Higgs v Farmor’s School [2023] EAT 89
Appeal over finding that the claimant had not been dismissed for reasons connected to her protected beliefs after she had posted on Facebook comments that her employer considered homophobic / transphobic.
- cases
11/07/2023 10:55
-
Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council v Bonsu [2023] EAT 74
Appeal by respondent against a decision by a majority concerning conduct of an investigation in race discrimination proceedings.
- cases
10/07/2023 10:57
-
Greasley-Adams v Royal Mail Group Ltd [2023] EAT 86
Appeal against the dismissal of the Claimant claims relating to sections 26 and 27 of the Equality Act 2010 (harassment and victimisation). Appeal dismissed.
- cases
04/07/2023 14:36
-
General Medical Council v Karim [2023] EAT 87
Appeal against a successful claim of direct race discrimination. Appeal allowed.
- cases
04/07/2023 09:41
-
Tanase v Barchester Healthcare Limited [2023] EAT 84
Appeal against dismissal of claims through failure to comply with an unless order.
- cases
03/07/2023 12:19
-
Connor v Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire Police [2023] EAT 42
Appeal against the calculation of accrued holiday pay after the Claimant's employment was terminated. Appeal allowed.
- cases
28/06/2023 15:48
-
Kohli v Department for International Trade [2023] EAT 82
Appeal against decision that dismissal was not unfair on the grounds that the ET had not considered subconscious bias.
- cases
27/06/2023 12:12
-
Balcerzak v 1) George Birchall Service Ltd 2) Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy [2022] EAT 202
Appeal where a claim was rejected because the name of the respondent supposedly differed on the claim form and the ACAS EC certificate.
- cases
27/06/2023 10:13
-
Jakkhu v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd: [2023] EAT 77
Appeal against findings of ET in disability discrimination proceedings which had already been remitted to them for reconsideration.
- cases
26/06/2023 10:54
-
Alcedo Orange Ltd v Ferridge-Gunn [2023] EAT 78
Appeal by respondents against decision that the dismissal was unfair as it related to the pregnancy of the claimant not her performance.
- cases
23/06/2023 10:02
