worker
-
Uber B.V. & Ors v Aslam & Ors UKEAT/0056/17/DA
Appeal against a finding that Uber drivers were workers. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
13/11/2017 15:18
-
Aslam, Farrar and Others v Uber 2202551/2015 & Others
Judgment concerning whether the claimants are self employed or employed as workers as they claimed. It was found that the claimants were workers and so due adjusted pay under the National Minimum Wages Regulations
- cases
30/10/2016 10:27
-
Roberts v Wilson's Solicitors LLP & Ors UKEAT/0339/15/RN
Appeal against the striking out of the Claimant's claim for compensation for post-termination financial losses following the termination of his membership of the LLP. Appeal allowed.
- cases
26/04/2016 10:26
-
Pimlico Plumbers Ltd & Anor v Smith UKEAT/0495/12/DM
Appeal against a ruling that the claimant was a worker within the meaning of section 230(3)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and thus had jurisdiction to consider complaints of direct disability discrimination, discrimination by reason of failure to make reasonable adjustments, and in respect of holiday pay as well as in respect of unauthorised deductions from wages. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
03/12/2014 12:15
-
Plastering Contractors Stanmore Ltd v Holden UKEAT/0074/14/LA
Appeal against a ruling that the claimant was a worker for the purposes of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and the Employment Rights Act 1996 and could therefore pursue his claim of holiday pay. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
11/09/2014 11:47
-
Clyde & Co LLP & Anor v Bates Van Winkelhof [2012] EWCA Civ 1207
Appeal concerning issues of whether a member of an LLP was entitled to bring whistle blowing and discrimination claims.
- cases
27/09/2012 08:45
-
The Hospital Medical Group Limited v Westwood [2012] EWCA Civ 1005
Appeal against finding that the claimant was a worker for the purposes of the ERA where the claimant carried out the business under his own account. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
27/07/2012 08:33
-
Yorkshire Window Company v Parkes UKEAT/0484/09/SM
Appeal against a ruling that, although the claimant was not an employee and so could not bring a claim of unfair dismissal, he was a ‘worker’ within the meaning of Regulation 2 of the Working Time Regulations, and as such could bring a claim for holiday pay. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
02/06/2010 11:30
