worker
-
Johnson v Transopco UK Ltd EA-2020-000780-AT
Appeal against an ET decision that the Claimant was not a worker. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
20/01/2022 12:39
-
Stojsavljevic & Turner v DPD Group UK Ltd EA-2019-000259-JOJ
Appeal against finding in the ET that the claimants, who both operated parcel delivery franchises, were not employees or workers.
- cases
04/01/2022 12:24
-
Main v SpaDental Ltd EA-2020-000023-AT
Appeal against a finding that the Claimant was not a worker. Appeal allowed.
- cases
03/12/2021 14:03
-
Stuart Delivery Ltd v Augustine [2021] EWCA Civ 1514
Appeal against an EAT ruling which agreed with the ET that the Claimant was a worker. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
25/10/2021 14:50
-
Nursing and Midwifery Council v Somerville UKEAT/0258/20/RN
Appeal against the ET’s finding that the Claimant was a worker. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
20/05/2021 11:54
-
Addison Lee Ltd v Lange & Ors [2021] EWCA Civ 594
Following the Supreme Court decision in Uber, Addison Lee have been refused permission to appeal against the decision that the Claimant drivers were workers for the purposes of the Employment Rights Act 1996, Working Time Regulations 1998 and the National Minimum Wage Act 1998.
- cases
23/04/2021 12:18
-
Uber BV and others v Aslam and others [2021] UKSC 5
Appeal against an ET decision (upheld by the EAT and Court of Appeal) that Uber drivers were workers for the purposes of employment legislation and therefore entitled to be paid the minimum wage, to receive holiday pay and to benefit from other protections. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
19/02/2021 10:38
-
Glasgow City Council v Johnstone and another UKEATS/0011/18/JW
Appeal against the ET’s finding that the relationship between the Claimants and the Council was contractual in nature. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
21/09/2020 14:08
-
Varnish v British Cycling Federation (t/a British Cycling) UKEAT/0022/20/LA
Appeal against the ET’s finding that the Claimant was not an employee of the Respondent or a worker. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
21/07/2020 16:12
-
Digital Communication Systems Ltd v Scully UKEAT/0182/19/LA
Appeal against the ET’s decision that that the Claimant was a “limb (b)” worker for the purposes of employment legislation. Appeal allowed.
- cases
03/02/2020 17:36
