worker
-
Stuart Delivery Ltd v Augustine [2021] EWCA Civ 1514
Appeal against an EAT ruling which agreed with the ET that the Claimant was a worker. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
25/10/2021 14:50
-
Nursing and Midwifery Council v Somerville UKEAT/0258/20/RN
Appeal against the ET’s finding that the Claimant was a worker. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
20/05/2021 11:54
-
Addison Lee Ltd v Lange & Ors [2021] EWCA Civ 594
Following the Supreme Court decision in Uber, Addison Lee have been refused permission to appeal against the decision that the Claimant drivers were workers for the purposes of the Employment Rights Act 1996, Working Time Regulations 1998 and the National Minimum Wage Act 1998.
- cases
23/04/2021 12:18
-
Uber BV and others v Aslam and others [2021] UKSC 5
Appeal against an ET decision (upheld by the EAT and Court of Appeal) that Uber drivers were workers for the purposes of employment legislation and therefore entitled to be paid the minimum wage, to receive holiday pay and to benefit from other protections. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
19/02/2021 10:38
-
Glasgow City Council v Johnstone and another UKEATS/0011/18/JW
Appeal against the ET’s finding that the relationship between the Claimants and the Council was contractual in nature. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
21/09/2020 14:08
-
Varnish v British Cycling Federation (t/a British Cycling) UKEAT/0022/20/LA
Appeal against the ET’s finding that the Claimant was not an employee of the Respondent or a worker. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
21/07/2020 16:12
-
Digital Communication Systems Ltd v Scully UKEAT/0182/19/LA
Appeal against the ET’s decision that that the Claimant was a “limb (b)” worker for the purposes of employment legislation. Appeal allowed.
- cases
03/02/2020 17:36
-
Augustine v Econnect Cars Ltd UKEAT/0231/18/OO
Appeal against the ET’s findings that the Claimant was a “worker” but not an “employee”, that the Claimant was not a “part-time worker” and that the Claimant’s treatment at the end of the relationship was not for any prohibited reason. Appeal allowed in part.
- cases
03/01/2020 15:41
-
Stuart Delivery Ltd v Augustine UKEAT/0219/18/BA
Appeal against the ET’s finding that the Claimant was not an employee of the Respondent but that, under certain arrangements, he was a “worker” of the Respondent. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
13/12/2019 17:41
-
Gilham v Ministry of Justice [2019] UKSC 44
Appeal against the Court of Appeal’s findings that the Appellant was not a “worker” and that denying her whistle-blowing protection was not discrimination in the enjoyment of her right to freedom of expression and thus contrary to Article 14 of the ECHR read with Article 10. Appeal allowed.
- cases
16/10/2019 15:04
