equal pay
-
Audit Commission v Haq & Ors UKEAT/0123/10/LA
Appeal against finding in Equal Pay Act claims that a differential in pay after amalgamation of of posts was indirectly discriminatory and objective justification had not been proved. Appeal allowed.
- cases
18/03/2011 16:53
-
West Dunbartonshire Council v Smith & Ors UKEATS/0029/10/BI
Appeal against the decision of the ET which held that the claimants, who were pursuing equal pay claims, had complied with s32 of the Employment Act 2002 and that accordingly the ET had jurisdiction so hear their claims.
- cases
11/03/2011 16:48
-
Bury Metropolitan Borough Council v Hamilton & Ors: Council of the City of Sunderland v Brennan & Ors UKEAT/0413-5/09/ZT
Appeals, heard together, by two local authorities concerning bonus schemes in Equal Pay Act claims and a cross-appeal by one set of claimants in a pay protection claim. Appeals dismissed in bonus scheme claims. Cross-appeal allowed in pay protection claim.
- cases
29/01/2011 10:38
-
North & Ors v Dumfries and Galloway Council [2011] CSIH 2
Appeal against decision of EAT which rejected the selection of comparators in an equal pay claim. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
14/01/2011 13:01
-
Copple & Ors v Littlewoods Plc & Ors UKEAT/0116/10/ZT
Appeals against declarations made in respect of entitlement to access a pension scheme, which had previously been closed to part-timers, where the claimants claimed that the declaration should remain in place notwithstanding that the scheme was subsequently open to them. Appeals dismissed.
- cases
31/12/2010 17:25
-
Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Hospitals Trust v Armstrong & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1203
Renewed application for permission to appeal in Equal Pay claim. Application refused.
- cases
05/11/2010 18:09
-
East Dunbartonshire Council v Trade Union Backed Claimants & Ors UKEATS/0005/10/BI
Appeal against decision of the ET to allow amendment of an equal pay claim (adding new comparators) which, if it had been a fresh claim instead, would have been time barred. The respondent also objected to the fact they had had no opportunity to resolve the claims involving the new comparators at the grievance stage, and the Tribunal erred by saying that any prejudice suffered could be met by reducing the compensatory award. Appeal allowed; the EAT agreed that the amended claim did not meet the statutory criteria for a reduction in compensation, they allowed the claimants to amend their claims and remit these claims to the same Employment Judge to consider the applications to amend.
- cases
05/10/2010 16:15
-
South Lanarkshire Council v Russell & Ors UKEATS/0067/09/BI
Appeal against an order requiring the respondent employer to provide additional information in respect of an equal pay claim. The order was held to be incompetent because, despite the hearing taking place before a full Tribunal, the Employment Judge made the order alone, contrary to rule 18(2). In the alternative, if the Employment Judge wanted to make a standalone order under rule 10, the lay members should not have heard the argument. Appeal allowed and case remitted to the Tribunal.
- cases
13/08/2010 11:28
-
Brownbill & Ors v St Helens & Knowsley Hospital NHS Trust UKEAT/0074/10/CEA
Appeal against the Employment Tribunal’s dismissal of claims for equal pay. Appeal allowed.
- cases
09/08/2010 14:47
-
White v Burton's Foods Ltd UKEAT/0514/09/LA
Appeal against finding that the claimant was not in the same employment as the comparators put forward in Equal Pay Act claims. Appeal dismissed as the correct principles had been applied and the finding was not perverse.
- cases
08/07/2010 09:58
