cases
-
Harpur Trust v Brazel [2022] UKSC 21
Appeal against a Court of Appeal judgment regarding the calculation of annual leave and holiday pay entitlements for workers who work for varying hours during only certain weeks of the year but have a contract throughout that year. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
21/07/2022 12:51
-
Citibank & Ors v Kirk [2022] EAT 103
Appeal against a finding of unfair dismissal and age discrimination, and against two remedy judgments. Two of the three grounds in the liability appeal were allowed; the remedy appeals were dismissed.
- cases
20/07/2022 10:03
-
FDA & Ors v Bhardwaj [2022] EAT 97
Appeal and cross appeal against various costs orders. Appeals dismissed.
- cases
19/07/2022 10:12
-
Higgs v Farmor's School & Anor [2022] EAT 101
Application for the recusal of a lay member on the basis that they had made a number of public statements on Twitter that expressed firmly held views on issues relevant to the appeal, giving rise to the appearance of bias. Application allowed.
- cases
19/07/2022 09:39
-
Pubbi v Your-Move.co.uk [2022] EAT 96
Appeal against a finding that the Claimant had been fairly dismissed. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
15/07/2022 09:39
-
Edey v London Borough of Lambeth & Anor [2022] EAT 94
Appeal against the striking out of various complaints. Appeal allowed in part.
- cases
14/07/2022 09:18
-
Hanson Quarry Products Europe Limited of Hanson House v Luck [2022] EAT 98
Appeal by respondent employer against decision that the claimant, a lorry driver, had been constructively unfairly dismissed after he had tried to return to work following a period of ill health that prevented him from driving.
- cases
08/07/2022 06:27
-
Basfar v Wong [2022] UKSC 20
Supreme Court decision regarding diplomatic immunity when keeping a domestic employee in conditions of modern slavery.
- cases
07/07/2022 07:00
-
Mackereth v The Department of Work and Pensions (1) Advanced Personnel Management Group (UK) Limited (2): [2022] EAT 99
Appeal against dismissal of discrimination claims where the claimant had - for religious reasons - refused to agree to use the preferred pronouns of service users.
- cases
05/07/2022 06:43
-
Webster & Anor v USA [2022] EAT 92
Conjoined appeals against findings that there was no jurisdiction to hear the claims because of state immunity where both claimants were employed by US air force.
- cases
03/07/2022 13:16
