cases
-
Williamson v The Bishop of London and Others [2022] EAT 118
Appeal against decision in ET that proceedings were a nullity as the claimant was subject to a CPO and the High Court could not give permission retrospectively.
- cases
20/08/2022 13:19
-
Piepenbrook v London School of Economics & Political Science [2022] EAT 119
Application by the Respondent to this appeal, the LSE, for an order to prevent the disclosure to the public of the identity of a woman in these appeal proceedings and in the proceedings in the ET. The application was granted.
- cases
19/08/2022 13:26
-
St Mungo's Community Housing Association v Finnerty [2022] EAT 117
Appeal against a finding that the Claimant had not been unfairly or wrongfully dismissed. Appeal allowed.
- cases
19/08/2022 13:04
-
Simmonds-Plummer v London Borough Of Hammersmith & Fulham [2022] EAT 50
Appeal against strike out of claims under the Equality Act where the claimant had resigned in advance of a disciplinary hearing yet the hearing went ahead without her and she was summarily dismissed.
- cases
19/08/2022 12:41
-
Nailard v Unite the Union [2022] EAT 102
Appeal against various aspects of the Claimant's partly successful claims of sex discrimination and harassment. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
19/08/2022 10:55
-
Ward v Dimensions (UK) Ltd [2022] EAT 110
Appeal against a finding that the Claimant had been fairly dismissed. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
17/08/2022 11:14
-
Cygnet Behavioural Health Ltd v Britton [2022] EAT 108
Appeal against a finding that it had not been reasonably practical for the Claimant to have presented his claim in time and that the claim was presented within a reasonable period after expiry of the primary time limit. Appeal allowed.
- cases
17/08/2022 10:33
-
Garcia v Bigbux & Ors [2022] EAT 95
Appeal against a decision to consolidate three claims made by the Claimant, which were to be considered at a hearing on the issue of strikeout. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
17/08/2022 10:13
-
Hanson Quarry Products Europe Limited of Hanson House v Luck [2022] EAT 98
Appeal against a finding that the Claimant had been constructively unfairly dismissed and had suffered unlawful deductions from wages. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
16/08/2022 09:33
-
Sejpal v Rodericks Dental Limited [2022] EAT 91
Appeal against a finding that the Claimant was not a worker. Appeal allowed.
- cases
15/08/2022 09:39
