TUPE
-
Skills Development Scotland Co Ltd v Buchanan & Anor UKEATS/0042/10/BI
Appeal against a successful equal pay claim in circumstances where there had been a TUPE transfer. Appeal allowed and claimant’s claims dismissed.
- cases
17/07/2011 21:05
-
Parkwood Leisure Limited v Alemo-Herron & Ors [2011] UKSC 26
Judgment concerning whether collective agreements that are negotiated from time to time can bind an employer following a transfer of employment. The issue was referred to the ECJ for a preliminary reference.
- cases
16/06/2011 09:28
-
Pressure Coolers Ltd v Molloy & Ors UKEAT/0272/10/RN
Appeals against decision, following a review, that the Respondent was liable to pay the claimant's basic award and notice following his dismissal after a “pre-pack” administration. Appeals dismissed.
- cases
10/06/2011 17:30
-
I Lab Facilities Ltd v Metcalfe & Ors UKEAT/0441/10/JOJ
Appeal against a ruling by the ET that there had been a relevant TUPE transfer. Appeal allowed and remitted to a fresh Tribunal.
- cases
15/05/2011 14:54
-
TUPE and companies in administration - a dead cert?
Mark Shulman and Rachael Taylor of Cumberland Ellis look at recent cases on insolvency and the implications under TUPE
- resources
08/05/2011 17:56
-
Marland v Heartland (Midlands) Limited [2011] EWCA Civ 438
Appeal by respondent in breach of contract proceedings against finding that he was protected by TUPE in circumstances where he was transferred to a new employer during his notice period. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
15/04/2011 16:32
-
Spaceright Europe Ltd v Baillavoine & Anor UKEAT/0339/10/SM
Appeal against a ruling that the claimant had been unfairly dismissed following a TUPE transfer. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
04/04/2011 11:10
-
OTG Ltd v Barke & Ors UKEAT/0320/09/RN
Five appeals, listed together, concerning the correct approach on the issue of whether administration can disapply regulation 4 of TUPE.
- cases
21/02/2011 08:56
-
CLECE SA v Maria Socorro Martin Valor and Ayuntamiento de Cobisa (Case C-463/09)
ECJ judgment after request for preliminary ruling as to whether Article 1(1)(a) and (b) of Directive 2001/23 must be interpreted as meaning that that directive applies to “a situation in which a municipal authority which has contracted out the cleaning of its premises to a private company decides to terminate its contract with that company and to undertake those cleaning services itself, by hiring new staff for that purpose.” The Court ruled that the it did not apply in these circumstances.
- cases
31/01/2011 10:48
-
Zaman & Ors v Kozee Sleep Products Ltd t/a Dorlux Beds UK UKEAT/0312/10/CEA
Appeal against application of a cap on the weekly pay used in the calculation of compensation after the respondents breached their obligations under TUPE. Appeal allowed.
- cases
31/12/2010 18:04