age discrimination
-
Smith v Department for Business & Skills UKEAT/0308/12/RN; Budgen v Ministry of Justice UKEAT/0309/12/RN
Appeal against a decision that the claimants, who were bringing age discrimination claims, were in materially different circumstances to the comparators and so the claim should be dismissed. Appeal allowed and the objectivity issue was remitted to the same Tribunal for determination.
- cases
27/01/2014 12:00
-
Mitra v Montpelier Professional (West End) Ltd Practising as AH Montpelier UKEAT/0529/12/GE
Appeal against a finding that the claimant had not been dismissed because of his age. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
17/01/2014 10:22
-
Heron v Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council UKEAT/0566/12/SM
Appeal against the rejection of the claimant’s claim of age discrimination after her redundancy payment was less than that of her younger colleagues. Appeal allowed and the respondent ordered to pay the difference.
- cases
21/12/2013 13:56
-
Otober v Croydon College & Ors UKEAT/0285/13/LA
Appeal against the striking out of the claimant’s claims of age and race discrimination in respect of the failure to provide him with references and the disposal of a vacancy that occurred and his application for it. Appeal allowed and remitted before a different judge.
- cases
18/10/2013 22:30
-
Baskaran v IMTech Traffic & Infra UK Ltd UKEAT/0018/13/GE
Appeal against a finding that the claimant had not suffered age or race discrimination when he failed to secure any of the jobs for which he had applied. Appeal also against a costs order of £10,000 made against the claimant. The appeal succeeded only as far as the amount of the costs order was concerned and this was remitted to the Tribunal for reconsideration.
- cases
17/10/2013 20:49
-
Lockwood v Department of Work and Pensions & Anor [2013] EWCA Civ 1195
Appeal against a finding by the ET, which was upheld by the EAT, that the claimant had not suffered age discrimination when her redundancy payment was less than someone who was older than her. The first ground of appeal was allowed; she had suffered age discrimination. However, the appeal was dismissed on the basis that the difference in payments was a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.
- cases
14/10/2013 11:51
-
Osoba v The Chief Constable of the Hertfordshire Constabulary UKEAT/0055/13/BA
Appeal against the rejection of the claimant’s claim of age discrimination. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
19/09/2013 10:10
-
Copeland v E Coomes (Holdings) Ltd UKEAT/0606/12/LA
Appeal against the dismissal of a claim of age discrimination when the claimant was forced to retire at the age of 65. Cross appeal against a finding that the dismissal was automatically unfair. Both appeal and cross appeal were allowed.
- cases
16/08/2013 14:20
-
CVS Solicitors & Anor v Van Der Borgh UKEAT/0009/13/KN
Appeal against a finding that the claimant was an employee of the respondent for the purposes of his claims of age discrimination under the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 and of religious discrimination under the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
29/07/2013 09:29
-
Rowstock Ltd & Anor v Jessemey (EHRC Intervening) UKEAT/0112/12/DM
Appeal against a decision that post termination victimisation could not be pursued because the Equality Act 2010 expressly excludes it. Cross-appeal against a failure to make any Polkey reduction in the compensation awarded. Appeal dismissed, cross-appeal allowed.
- cases
06/03/2013 09:06
