time extension
-
Tamponi v Medequip Assistive Technology Ltd [2025] EAT 180
Appeal against the rejection of the Claimant's claims of direct race discrimination. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
17/12/2025 16:38
-
Mangwanya v National Association of Citizens Advice Bureaux [2025] EAT 175
Appeal against the refusal to allow an application to appeal an ET judgment after it was submitted a few hours late. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
17/12/2025 16:24
-
Ahmed v Capital Arches Group Ltd [2025] EAT 133
Appeals against claims for discrimination being dismissed as out of time.
- cases
15/10/2025 15:27
-
Logo v Payone Gmbh and others [2025] EAT 95
Appeal against the dismissal of the Claimant's claims of harassment. Appeal allowed.
- cases
14/07/2025 13:29
-
Melki v Bouygues E and S Contracting UK Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 585
Appeal against the refusal of the EAT to exercise its power to extend time. Appeal allowed.
- cases
02/07/2025 14:55
-
JK v Ealing [2025] EAT 78
Appeal against the dismissal of the Claimant's claim of unfair dismissal as it was out of time, and against a decision that it was not just an equitable to extend time in respect of her claims of disability discrimination and harassment and against a refusal to grant an anonymity order. Appeal allowed.
- cases
25/06/2025 13:16
-
Wilson v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd [2025] EAT 80
Appeal against the refusal to extend time for the Claimant's appeal. Appeal allowed.
- cases
23/06/2025 12:44
-
Equans Services Ltd v Bennett [2025] EAT 33
Appeal against a finding that a claim for age discrimination had been presented out of time but it was just and equitable to extend time. Appeal allowed.
- cases
16/05/2025 10:58
-
HSBC Bank PLC v Chevalier-Firescu [2024] EWCA Civ 1550
Appeal against an EAT decision that allowed the Claimant's appeal against the dismissal of her claims because they were out of time. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
07/02/2025 10:43
-
Douglas v North Lanarkshire Council [2024] EAT 194
Appeal against a decision not to uphold the Claimant's claim of unfair dismissal and the ET's conclusion that it did not have jurisdiction to consider his claim under section 47B of the Employment Rights Act, 1996 that he was subjected to detriment on the ground of making protected disclosures. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
07/02/2025 10:10
