Groom v Maritime and Coastguard Agency [2024] EAT 71

Appeal concerning whether a volunteer was a worker and so could have trade union support at a disciplinary hearing

The Claimant was a volunteer in the Coastal Rescue Service and the claim before the Tribunal was for refusal to permit the Claimant to be accompanied by a trade union representative at a disciplinary hearing: this support was only allowed if he was a limb b) worker. The ET found there was no contract between the parties as a matter of construction.
In this judgment, Gavin Mansfield KC, sitting as a Deputy High Court judge finds the ET erred in its analysis as there was a clear right to remuneration in respect of many activities, and it was irrelevant that the Claimant had to submit a claim for payment and that many volunteers in practice did not do so and plainly a contract existed. The appeal was allowed and a decision was substituted that the Claimant was a worker when he attended activities for which he remunerated.

https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/eat/2024/71

Published: 15/05/2024 14:55

Sign up for free email alerts

Email address
First name
Last name
Receive daily
Receive weekly
I agree to this site's terms and conditions

message