cases
-
Duployen v Whyte & Mackay Ltd [2025] EAT 3
Appeal against a decision that did not reinstate or reengage the Claimant after his successful claim of unfair dismissal, plus other complaints about the level of compensation awarded. Appeal allowed in relation to one small ground only.
- services
- cases
24/02/2025 11:09
-
Higgs v Farmor's School [2025] EWCA Civ 109
Appeal by the Claimant who believed that the EAT, which remitted her claims to the ET should instead itself have held that her claim succeeded. Appeal allowed.
- cases
21/02/2025 10:56
-
East Lancashire NHS Trust v Imran Akram [2025] EAT 2
Appeal against the method employed by the ET to calculate holiday pay. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
19/02/2025 16:38
-
The British Council v Sellers [2025] EAT 1
Appeal against an order for re-engagement after a finding of unfair dismissal. Appeal allowed.
- cases
19/02/2025 15:21
-
Sadia Shakil v Samsons Limited [2024] EAT 192
Appeal against the award for injury to feelings made to the Claimant. Appeal allowed.
- cases
19/02/2025 11:41
-
Fox v South Essex Academy Trust [2024] EAT 199
Appeal against strike out of claim after the claimant failed to comply with unless orders.
- cases
12/02/2025 10:24
-
Quitongo v Airdrieonians Football Club & Hetherington [2024] EAT 201
Appeal arising from claims of victimisation and harassment of a professional footballer following racist abuse from fans.
- cases
11/02/2025 14:02
-
Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council v Oliver [2024] EAT 193
Appeal by respondent employer against a finding of automatic unfair dismissal as this was not part of the original claim.
- cases
11/02/2025 10:45
-
HSBC Bank PLC v Chevalier-Firescu [2024] EWCA Civ 1550
Appeal against an EAT decision that allowed the Claimant's appeal against the dismissal of her claims because they were out of time. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
07/02/2025 10:43
-
Douglas v North Lanarkshire Council [2024] EAT 194
Appeal against a decision not to uphold the Claimant's claim of unfair dismissal and the ET's conclusion that it did not have jurisdiction to consider his claim under section 47B of the Employment Rights Act, 1996 that he was subjected to detriment on the ground of making protected disclosures. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
07/02/2025 10:10
