redundancy
-
Davey v Harrods Ltd [2023] EAT 133
Appeal against the striking out of the Claimant's case because he had not complied with various orders. Appeal allowed and the strike out was set aside.
- cases
03/11/2023 14:58
-
Davey v Harrods Ltd [2023] EAT 133
Appeal against the striking out of the Claimant's case because he had not complied with various orders. Appeal allowed and the strike out was set aside.
- cases
31/10/2023 16:31
-
Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust v Stevenson & Ors [2023] EAT 115
Appeal over whether the ET had erred in concluding the claimants refusal of alternative "suitable employment” in a redundancy process was not unreasonable.
- cases
19/09/2023 10:10
-
Lovingangels Care Ltd v Mhindurwa [2023] EAT 65
Appeal by respondent against decision they had unfairly dismissed the claimant during the pandemic and raising the question of whether that event should alter the legal analysis to be applied.
- cases
15/06/2023 14:40
-
Campbell v Tesco Personal Finance PLC [2023] EAT 68
Appeal against decision that dismissal for redundancy was fair.
- cases
02/06/2023 15:30
-
Teixeira v Zaika Restaurant Ltd & DaSilva [2022] EAT 171
Appeal against a decision that the Claimant's compensatory award should be reduced to zero. Appeal allowed.
- cases
10/02/2023 11:15
-
Mogane v Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust & Anor [2022] EAT 139
Appeal against a decision that the Claimant had not been unfairly dismissed. Appeal allowed.
- cases
28/11/2022 16:22
-
Swiss Re Corporate Solutions Ltd v Sommer [2022] EAT 78
Appeal against a decision that a 'without prejudice' letter from the Respondent's solicitor to the Claimant, with an offer to settle, was admissible in evidence at the full merits hearing. Appeal allowed.
- cases
10/06/2022 10:05
-
Secure Care UK Ltd v Mott EA-2019-000977-AT
Appeal against a ruling that the Claimant had been unfairly dismissed by reason of making protected disclosures. Appeal allowed.
- cases
22/10/2021 09:44
-
Carillion Services Ltd v Benson & Ors EA-2021-000269-BA
Appeal against a decision that the Respondent had failed to comply with the requirements of section 188 TULRCA to consult with representatives about proposals to dismiss as redundant 20 or more employees at an establishment within a period of 90 days or less. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
19/10/2021 07:41
