practice and procedure
-
Brill v Interactive Business Communications Ltd UKEAT/0062/09/JOJ & UKEAT/0097/09/JOJ
Appeal by claimant against the decision of the ET: 1) to revoke permission to amend the claimant's ET1, and 2) to remove the sanction of an unless order, striking out the respondent's response. Appeal against revocation of permission to amend the ET1, and, if necessary, the application to amend the ET1 was allowed and remitted to an Employment Judge. The appeal against the removal of the strike out was dismissed.
- cases
08/07/2010 09:30
-
Scotthorne v Four Seasons Conservatories (UK) Ltd UKEAT/0178/10/ZT
Appeal by claimant, who had been dismissed for gross misconduct, against the refusal of the Tribunal to order disclosure of documents which could support the claimant’s argument that the respondent was trying to find ways to remove him. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
23/06/2010 18:33
-
Scott v Matthew Arnold & Baldwin Solicitors UKEATPA/1712/09/JOJ
Appeal under rule 3(10) against decision that a dismissal was fair and in circumstances where the claimant mistakenly thought she had been successful at the original hearing. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
18/06/2010 10:25
-
May v Greenwich Council UKEAT/0102/10/LA
Appeal against rejection of the claimant's ET1 form because the Tribunal ruled that it was illegible. Appeal succeeded: the EAT ruled that, although the claim form was difficult to read in places, the original claim form was readable without the use of a magnifying glass, and thus the Tribunal's decision was perverse.
- cases
01/06/2010 13:28
-
Home Office v Tariq [2010] EWCA Civ 462
Appeal and cross-appeal concerning the use of the closed material procedure and special advocates in employment tribunals. Both were dismissed.
- cases
11/05/2010 17:52
-
Johnson v Edwardian International Hotels [2010] EWCA Civ 466
Application for permission to appeal in discrimination claim. Application refused.
- cases
06/05/2010 10:53
-
The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v Rixon UKEAT/0126/10/SM
Appeal concerning whether an employment judge could, at a PHR, review the decision of a Regional Judge that a claim was not valid, where the claimant was seeking anonymity and had not provided his name and address on the claim form.
- cases
28/04/2010 10:32
-
Epelle v London Borough of Camden [2010] EWCA Civ 46
Application for permission to appeal extension of time to submit a completed ET1 on the grounds that the failure to do so was related to the claimant's disability. Application refused.
- cases
05/02/2010 17:22
-
Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) (Amendment) Regulations 2010
2010 No. 131These Regulations come into force on 6th April 2010 and amend the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2004 (S.I. 2004/1861) (as amended by S.I. 2004/2351, 2005/435, 2005/1865, 2008/2683 and 2008/3240).These R…
- legislation
02/02/2010 16:44
-
Plank v Atkins Ltd UKEATPA/0799/09/JOJ
Judgment concerning the meaning of a 'fresh Notice of Appeal' under Rule 3(8) of the EAT rules. Application under Rule 3(10) and underlying appeal dismissed.
- cases
28/01/2010 14:42