costs
-
Jackson v Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council UKEATPA/1247/10/JOJ
Appeal against the dismissal of the claimant’s claims, largely on the basis that she was not an employee, and against a costs order made in favour of the respondent. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
27/05/2012 12:00
-
AQ Ltd v Holden UKEAT/0021/12/CEA
Appeal against the rejection of the respondent’s application for costs against the claimant, whose unfair constructive dismissal claim failed. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
19/05/2012 18:06
-
Baker v Tote Bookmakers Ltd UKEAT/0538/11/ZT
Appeal against a costs order that was made against the claimant. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
17/05/2012 13:41
-
Turning Point (Scotland) v Perry & Anor UKEATS/0049/11/BI
Appeal against the refusal of an application for an order for expenses against the claimants after they withdrew their claims under the NMW. Appeal allowed.
- cases
14/05/2012 09:22
-
Case Round-Up: May 2012
In this month’s round-up, Mark Shulman consultant solicitor with Keystone Law looks at the implications of two key Supreme Court judgments on justifying age discrimination, explains why a lap dancer was found to be an employee and reviews two recent decisions on Tribunal costs orders and the ability to pay.
- resources
04/05/2012 16:32
-
Doyle v North West London Hospitals Trust UKEAT/0271/11/RN
Appeal against a costs order that the claimant pay the whole costs, which were estimated to be around £100,000, of the proceedings. Appeal allowed on the issue of ‘ability to pay’ and remitted to the same Tribunal.
- cases
21/04/2012 20:51
-
Godfrey Morgan Solicitors Ltd v Marzan UKEAT/0465/11/DM
Appeal against a time preparation order and unless order which were made against the respondent in an unlawful deduction from wages case. First appeal rejected, and second appeal allowed and the claim was remitted to a fresh Tribunal.
- cases
15/04/2012 17:45
-
Andorful v London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham UKEAT/0410/11/SM
Appeal against the striking out of a claim of race discrimination and against a costs order made against the claimant. The strike out appeal was rejected, but the costs were reduced from £10,000 to £5,000.
- cases
15/04/2012 09:49
-
Peat & Ors v Birmingham City Council UKEAT/0503/11/CEA
Appeal against a costs order which was made against the claimants on the basis that they had behaved unreasonably in the conduct of the case by pursuing it after the receipt of a costs warning letter from the respondent. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
15/04/2012 09:33
-
Osonnaya v Queen Mary University of London UKEAT/0225/11/SM
Appeal against a costs order of £500 made against the claimant after an adjournment of the PHR was successful. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
10/02/2012 14:50
