amendment of claim
-
Amending an ET1 - Case Round-Up: May 2018
In this month's round-up, Mark Shulman, consultant solicitor with Keystone Law, looks at a round-up of recent cases on the relevant issues for ETs when deciding whether to allow an ET1 to be amended.
- resources
09/05/2018 10:50
-
Patka v BBC & Anor UKEAT/0190/17/DM
Appeal against a decision to allow the Claimant to amend his ET1 but only to a limited extent. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
16/04/2018 10:39
-
Reuters Ltd v Cole UKEAT/0258/17/BA
Appeal against a decision allowing the Claimant to amend his claim so as to add claims of direct and indirect disability discrimination. Appeal allowed.
- cases
11/04/2018 11:29
-
Murray v Maclay Murray & Spens LLP UKEATS/0004/18/JW
Appeal against the refusal to allow the Claimant to join as Respondents members of an LLP, who had been members of the practice for whom she had worked. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
16/03/2018 14:57
-
Herry v Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council & Anor UKEAT/0170/17/LA
Appeal against a refusal to allow the Claimant to amend his claim. Appeal allowed.
- cases
06/03/2018 11:17
-
Galilee v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis UKEAT/0207/16/RN
Appeal against the refusal to allow the Claimant to amend his claim. Appeal allowed and remitted to the ET for reconsideration.
- cases
06/12/2017 11:12
-
Conteh v First Security (Guards) Ltd UKEAT/0178/17/LA
Appeal against the refusal to allow the Claimant to amend his claim to include claims of having made protected disclosures. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
05/12/2017 14:45
-
Ministry of Defence v Dixon UKEAT/0050/17/DM
Appeal against a decision that the ET had jurisdiction to hear the Claimant's claim of unfair dismissal. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
06/10/2017 11:10
-
Gillett v Bridge 86 Ltd UKEAT/0051/17/DM
Appeal against a refusal to allow the Claimant to amend her claim form to add a claim of unfair dismissal because of an alleged protected disclosure. Appeal allowed.
- cases
25/07/2017 09:59
-
Mechkarov v Citibank NA UKEAT/0119/17/DM
Appeal against a decision that the Claimant had not made a claim of public interest disclosure detriment in his ET1, and against a refusal for him to amend his claim to include it. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
13/07/2017 15:47
