cases
-
Simmonds-Plummer v London Borough Of Hammersmith & Fulham [2022] EAT 50
Appeal against strike out of claims under the Equality Act where the claimant had resigned in advance of a disciplinary hearing yet the hearing went ahead without her and she was summarily dismissed.
- cases
19/08/2022 12:41
-
Nailard v Unite the Union [2022] EAT 102
Appeal against various aspects of the Claimant's partly successful claims of sex discrimination and harassment. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
19/08/2022 10:55
-
Ward v Dimensions (UK) Ltd [2022] EAT 110
Appeal against a finding that the Claimant had been fairly dismissed. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
17/08/2022 11:14
-
Cygnet Behavioural Health Ltd v Britton [2022] EAT 108
Appeal against a finding that it had not been reasonably practical for the Claimant to have presented his claim in time and that the claim was presented within a reasonable period after expiry of the primary time limit. Appeal allowed.
- cases
17/08/2022 10:33
-
Garcia v Bigbux & Ors [2022] EAT 95
Appeal against a decision to consolidate three claims made by the Claimant, which were to be considered at a hearing on the issue of strikeout. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
17/08/2022 10:13
-
Hanson Quarry Products Europe Limited of Hanson House v Luck [2022] EAT 98
Appeal against a finding that the Claimant had been constructively unfairly dismissed and had suffered unlawful deductions from wages. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
16/08/2022 09:33
-
Sejpal v Rodericks Dental Limited [2022] EAT 91
Appeal against a finding that the Claimant was not a worker. Appeal allowed.
- cases
15/08/2022 09:39
-
Bahad v HSBC Bank Plc [2022] EAT 83
Appeal against a decision to strike out all the Claimant's claims. Appeal allowed in part.
- cases
12/08/2022 13:47
-
Laing v Bury and Bolton Citizens Advice [2022] EAT 85
Appeal against the dismissal of the Claimant's claims relating to deposit orders, witness orders and victimisation. Appeal allowed in part.
- cases
12/08/2022 12:52
-
Trentside Manor Care Limited & Ors v Raphael [2022] EAT 37
Appeal against a decision by the ET that litigation and legal advice privilege did not apply to a particular period while the Respondent was negotiating a flexible working request. Appeal allowed in part.
- cases
09/08/2022 14:20
