cases
-
Balcerzak v 1) George Birchall Service Ltd 2) Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy [2022] EAT 202
Appeal where a claim was rejected because the name of the respondent supposedly differed on the claim form and the ACAS EC certificate.
- cases
27/06/2023 10:13
-
Jakkhu v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd: [2023] EAT 77
Appeal against findings of ET in disability discrimination proceedings which had already been remitted to them for reconsideration.
- cases
26/06/2023 10:54
-
Alcedo Orange Ltd v Ferridge-Gunn [2023] EAT 78
Appeal by respondents against decision that the dismissal was unfair as it related to the pregnancy of the claimant not her performance.
- cases
23/06/2023 10:02
-
Sidhu v Our Place Schools Ltd [2023] EAT 70
Appeal against a decision of the ET rejecting the Claimant's claims against the Respondent of discrimination on grounds of race and/or religion or belief. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
21/06/2023 12:36
-
University of Huddersfield v Duxbury [2023] EAT 72
Appeal against the compensation awarded in a case where an additional award was also made to the successful Claimant. Appeal allowed.
- cases
19/06/2023 12:21
-
Lycatel Services Limited v Schneider [2023] EAT 81
Appeal over refusal to stay ET proceedings while High Court proceedings were ongoing in a complex case involving a dispute over £8m in bonus payments.
- cases
19/06/2023 08:27
-
Lovingangels Care Ltd v Mhindurwa [2023] EAT 65
Appeal by respondent against decision they had unfairly dismissed the claimant during the pandemic and raising the question of whether that event should alter the legal analysis to be applied.
- cases
15/06/2023 14:40
-
Pipe v Coventry University Higher Education Corporation [2023] EAT 73
Appeal against decision that the claimant, who had been diagnosed with a sleep disorder and ADHD, had not suffered discrimination through the operation of the respondent's progression framework.
- cases
14/06/2023 14:28
-
D v E [2023] EAT 66
Appeal against decision that the claim should be struck out as the claimant had insufficient service and there was no discrimination.
- cases
13/06/2023 15:31
-
LQP v 1) City of York Council 2) City of York Trading Ltd ( t/a Work with York): [2022] EAT 196
Appeal against case management decisions refusing applications to amend a claim and for an anonymity order.
- cases
12/06/2023 15:19
