unfair dismissal
-
Fox v South Essex Academy Trust UKEAT/0093/19/RN
Appeal against the ET’s dismissal of the Claimant’s claims of disability discrimination, harassment and unfair constructive dismissal. Appeal allowed.
- cases
20/03/2020 17:16
-
Uddin v London Borough of Ealing UKEAT/0165/19/RN
Appeal against the ET’s decision rejecting the Claimant’s claims of unfair and wrongful dismissal and sex and age discrimination. Appeal allowed in part.
- cases
25/02/2020 13:02
-
Lafferty v Nuffield Health UKEATS/0006/19/SS
Appeal against the ET’s decision rejecting the Claimant’s claim that he was unfairly dismissed. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
24/02/2020 17:02
-
Ikejiuba v WM Morrison Supermarkets Plc UKEAT/0049/19/OO
Appeal against the ET’s decision rejecting the Claimant’s claim for automatic unfair dismissal. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
19/02/2020 10:34
-
Scott v Kenton Schools Academy Trust UKEAT/0031/19/DA
Appeal against the ET’s decision dismissing the Claimant’s claims of disability discrimination and unfair dismissal. Appeal allowed in part.
- cases
12/02/2020 09:22
-
Robinson v His Highness Sheikh Khalid Bin Saqr Al Qasim UKEAT/0106/19/RN, UKEAT/0107/19/RN & UKEAT/0136/19/RN
Appeal against the ET’s decision dismissing the Claimant’s claims for unfair and wrongful dismissal. Appeal allowed in part.
- cases
11/02/2020 13:00
-
Shah v TIAA Ltd UKEAT/0180/19/BA
Appeal against the ET’s findings that the Respondent did not discriminate against the Claimant, harass her or unfairly dismiss her. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
21/01/2020 21:16
-
Q v Secretary of State for Justice UKEAT/0120/19/JOJ
Appeal against the ET’s decision dismissing the Claimant’s claim of unfair dismissal. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
17/01/2020 12:28
-
Sunshine Hotel Ltd (t/a Palm Court Hotel) v Goddard UKEAT/0154/19/OO
Appeal against the ET’s decision that the Claimant was unfairly dismissed. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
10/01/2020 15:51
-
Parkview Care Ltd v Fenn UKEAT/0112/19/BA
Appeal against the ET’s findings that 5% was an appropriate assessment of the Respondent’s contribution to his dismissal, and that the Respondent was entitled to his normal hourly rate when “sleeping in”. Appeal allowed in part.
- cases
08/01/2020 17:41
