time extension
-
Dootson v Royal Mail PLC UKEATPA/1315/09/ZT
Appeal against decision not to allow an application to appeal a disability discrimination claim because the application was lodged 2 days out of time. The application to appeal was lodged late, by mistake, by the lay representative of the claimant. The Registrar decided not to use their discretion to extend time. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
28/07/2010 11:07
-
Harper & Anor v Hopkins [2010] EWCA Civ 742
Renewed application for permission to appeal where the appellants had been refused an extension to appeal a decision in unfair dismissal claims in circumstances where they did not receive notification of a refused review application until 30 days after the decision was made. The application was adjourned to a full court.
- cases
06/07/2010 11:29
-
Lezo v OCS Group UK Ltd UKEAT/0104/10/SM
Appeal against ruling by Tribunal that, although it was not reasonably practicable for the claimant to present his claim within the 3 month time limit, an unreasonable period of extra time had elapsed before the claim was presented. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
30/06/2010 17:24
-
Riniker v City and Islington College Corporation UKEAT/0495/08/CEA
Appeal against judgment striking out a claim because the claimant had failed to comply with an ‘unless order’. The claimant also sought leave to amend her Notice of Appeal to add an appeal against a judgment dismissing her application for a review of the original judgment. Both appeals were dismissed.
- cases
29/06/2010 09:55
-
Moore v Marks and Spencer PLC UKEAT/0076/10/LA
Appeal against decision to refuse application, in the form of a new claim, to amend out of time claims under the Sex Discrimination Act and maternity regulations. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
22/06/2010 12:57
-
Ngo Mbog v Whitbread Group Plc UKEAT/0510/09/LA
Appeal against rejection of claim of unfair dismissal because the claim was out of time. Appeal allowed.
- cases
16/06/2010 14:08
-
Graham's Garden Machinery Ltd v Warne UKEAT/0155/10/DM
Appeal against the Tribunal’s decision not to revoke or review a ruling refusing to extend time to file the respondent’s ET3. Appeal succeeded and the matter remitted back to the Tribunal to decide on the question of whether to extend time. The claimant’s application for costs, on the basis that the appeal would not have been necessary had the respondent produced the correct evidence before the Tribunal, was refused.
- cases
01/06/2010 16:51
-
London Borough of Redbridge v Baynes UKEAT/0293/09/LA
Appeal by council against determinations in a pre-hearing review that the claimant was disabled and that time limits for her claim should be extended. The appeal was allowed and the claim dismissed.
- cases
24/05/2010 12:40
-
Evans v University of Oxford UKEATPA/1510/09/LA
Appeal against refusal by Registrar to accept an expression of dissatisfaction under rule 3(10) which was submitted out of time. Appeal was unsuccessful.
- cases
19/05/2010 11:19
-
Aziz v FDA [2010] EWCA Civ 304
Appeal against decision of the EAT that the ET was correct to dismiss claims of race discrimination because the claims were out of time. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
07/04/2010 16:11
