re-engagement
-
United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust v Farren UKEAT/0198/16/LA
Appeal against a decision by which the ET ordered that the Claimant was to be re-engaged by the Respondent, the ET having earlier found that she had been unfairly dismissed. Appeal allowed and remitted to the same Tribunal to re-consider the question of practicability.
- cases
20/12/2016 10:59
-
Beckford v London Borough of Southwark UKEAT/0210/14/JOJ
Appeal against a decision in which the claimant claimed that the Tribunal erred in failing to have regard to the claimant’s disability in considering re-engagement. Cross-appeal against a "Simmons v Castle" uplift which was made to the injury to feelings award. Appeal and cross-appeal were both dismissed.
- cases
07/12/2015 10:07
-
Hazel & Anor v The Manchester College [2014] EWCA Civ 72
Appeal against ET decisions, which were upheld by the EAT, that the dismissal of the two claimants was not for an ETO reason, and thus the dismissals were automatically unfair; and that they should be re-engaged, the effect of which was to preserve the claimants’ pre-dismissal rates of pay. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
10/02/2014 10:55
-
Oasis Community Learning v Wolff UKEAT/0364/12/MC
Appeal against an order for re-engagement after a finding of unfair dismissal. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
19/05/2013 10:04
-
McBride v The Employment Appeal Tribunal [2013] CSIH 4
Appeal against EAT's decision to quash an order for reinstatement and to remit the matter to a new Tribunal to assess contribution. The appeal on reinstatement was refused but allowed on the remittance issue.
- cases
26/01/2013 09:52
-
The Manchester College v Hazel & Anor UKEAT/0642/11/RN
Appeal against rulings that the claimants had been unfairly dismissed in the TUPE sense, and against an order for re-engagement. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
12/10/2012 14:46
-
Rembiszewski v Atkins Ltd UKEAT/0402/11/ZT
Appeal against a refusal to make an order for reinstatement or re-engagement after the claimant was dismissed. Conditional cross appeal by the respondent and an unconditional cross appeal against the ET’s failure to make a Polkey deduction. Appeal allowed, conditional cross appeal allowed and unconditional cross appeal dismissed.
- cases
11/10/2012 17:52
