race discrimination
-
Butt v Bradford Metropolitan District Council UKEAT/0210/10/ZT
Appeal against decision of the Tribunal that allegations of race discrimination fell within the Modification Order, and therefore the allegations could not proceed against the respondent, the Local Authority. Cross appeal by the respondent against ruling that other allegations fell outside the Modification Order and so therefore could proceed. Appeal dismissed and cross appeal allowed.
- cases
27/07/2010 10:10
-
The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis & Anor v Nonyelu UKEAT/0010/10/DM
Appeal against a finding of direct race discrimination. On analysis the act relied on disclosed no difference in treatment nor detriment suffered by the claimant. Appeal allowed and finding set aside.
- cases
21/07/2010 11:02
-
Edwards v Swindon Borough Council UKEAT/0095/10/LA
Appeal against ruling that the claimant was not directly or indirectly discriminated against by reason of her race. On the claim of direct discrimination, the ET accepted the respondent's non-discriminatory explanation of why the claimant was not offered a job. As far as the indirect discrimination claim is concerned, the claimant failed to establish provision, criterion or practice in the respondent’s organisation which puts a person of the claimant’s race or ethnicity at a disadvantage. The EAT, although stating that the Employment Tribunal's reasons were not a model to be followed, ruled that the judgment was Meek compliant. The EAT also agreed with the ET on both claims and dismissed the appeal.
- cases
09/07/2010 15:44
-
Forson v The Governing Body of Harwich School & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 751
Renewed application for permission to appeal in race discrimination, unfair dismissal and victimisation claims. Application refused.
- cases
02/07/2010 13:51
-
Nazir & Anor v Asim & Anor UKEAT/0332/09/RN
Appeal against findings of sexual and racial harassment and discrimination. The claims were brought against 2 members of a board, which was an unincorporated organisation: the Tribunal ruled that it had jurisdiction to hear the claims against the 2 board members in their capacity as representatives of the UA and not as individual perpetrators. 4 of the claims succeeded. The jurisdiction appeal was dismissed. The EATconfirmed that the board members were liable as 'employer' and not through vicarious or secondary liability. Claims of racial and sexual harassment and discrimination were remitted to a fresh Tribunal.
- cases
30/06/2010 17:28
-
Ngo Mbog v Whitbread Group Plc UKEAT/0510/09/LA
Appeal against rejection of claim of unfair dismissal because the claim was out of time. Appeal allowed.
- cases
16/06/2010 14:08
-
Kershaw v HMRC [2010] EWCA Civ 540
Renewed application to appeal EAT decision in race and sex discrimination claims. Application refused.
- cases
24/05/2010 10:06
-
Sheffield Black Drugs Service v Nagi UKEAT 0233/09/LA
Appeal by employer against findings of unfair dismissal and racial discrimination where the claimant had resigned over the internal handling of allegations made against and by the claimant. Appeals dismissed.
- cases
28/04/2010 10:48
-
Leeds City Council v Woodhouse [2010] EWCA Civ 410
Appeal against decision of EAT to refuse to strike out claims for alleged racial discrimination and harassment on the grounds that the claimant was not an employee. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
23/04/2010 14:13
-
Aziz v FDA [2010] EWCA Civ 304
Appeal against decision of the EAT that the ET was correct to dismiss claims of race discrimination because the claims were out of time. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
07/04/2010 16:11