anonymisation
-
AEL v Flight Centre (UK) Ltd [2024] EAT 116
Appeal against the dismissal of the Claimant's application for an anonymity order. Appeal allowed.
- cases
17/08/2024 13:52
-
F v J [2023] EAT 92
Appeal against the refusal to grant an anonymity order. Appeal allowed.
- cases
26/07/2023 12:30
-
LQP v 1) City of York Council 2) City of York Trading Ltd ( t/a Work with York): [2022] EAT 196
Appeal against case management decisions refusing applications to amend a claim and for an anonymity order.
- cases
12/06/2023 15:19
-
Frewer v Google UK Limited and Others [2022] EAT 34
Appeal concerning naming of clients of the respondent in documents sought for disclosure at ET proceedings.
- cases
24/03/2022 10:12
-
TYU v ILA Spa Ltd: EA-2019-000983-VP
Judgment relating to an appeal against a decision which refused an Appellant’s application for an order that her name be anonymised or redacted in a judgment relating to wrongful and unfair dismissal proceedings.
- cases
17/09/2021 07:43
-
Christie v Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton and Garrison LLP UKEAT/0036/20/AT
Appeal against the ET’s decision to make anonymisation orders. Appeal allowed.
- cases
05/03/2021 17:03
-
BBC v Roden UKEAT/0385/14/DA
Appeal against a refusal to set aside or vary an anonymity order. Appeal allowed.
- cases
13/05/2015 14:23
-
F v G UKEAT/0042/11/DA
Appeal by claimant against imposition of a permanent anonymity order under rule 49 of the Tribunal rules. The EAT found that the judge had been wrong to make the order under rule 49 but that the order was appropriate to protect the Article 8 rights of students and staff affected.
- cases
29/09/2011 17:50
-
A v B UKEAT/0206/09/SM
This was a supplementary judgment requesting further submissions from both parties as to whether the original judgment should remain anonymised. The EAT decided that the effect of Article 8 of the ECHR was that the Tribunal should, in the exercise of its powers to regulate its procedure under s. 30 (3) of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996 Act, confirm the steps already taken to protect the claimant’s identity.
- cases
24/03/2010 13:50
