cases
-
Pazur v Lexington Catering Services Ltd UKEAT/0008/19/LA
Appeal against the ET’s judgment dismissing the Claimant’s claims of detriment and automatic unfair dismissal in respect of the Working Time Regulations 1998 (“WTR”). Appeal allowed.
- cases
24/09/2019 16:31
-
Pearce v Bank of America Merrill Lynch & others UKEAT/0067/19/LA
Appeal against the ET’s judgment by which the Claimant’s claim of having suffered detriment for making protected disclosures was dismissed as having been presented out of time. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
23/09/2019 11:28
-
Raj v Capita Business Services Ltd & another UKEAT/0074/19/LA
Appeal against the ET’s decision dismissing the Claimant’s complaint of harassment related to sex. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
20/09/2019 23:05
-
Ugradar v Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust UKEAT/0301/18/BA
Appeal against part of the ET’s judgment, having upheld the Claimant’s claim for a contractual redundancy payment capped at £25,000, by which it rejected her claim for a statutory redundancy payment. Appeal allowed.
- cases
19/09/2019 16:15
-
Arthur v Hertfordshire Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust UKEAT/0121/19/LA
Appeal against the ET’s judgment striking out the Claimant’s claims of public interest disclosure detriment and dismissal, and its decision that, in the alternative, it would have made deposit orders as a condition of such claims being pursued. Appeal allowed in part.
- cases
18/09/2019 14:53
-
Kasongo v Humanscale UK Ltd UKEAT/0129/19/LA
Appeal against the ET’s decision refusing to allow the redacted parts of a draft letter dismissing the Claimant to be adduced as evidence in the case. Appeal allowed.
- cases
17/09/2019 15:00
-
Parnaby v Leicester City Council UKEAT/0025/19/BA
Appeal against the ET’s decision that the Claimant did not meet the definition of disabled person for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010 (“EqA”) because the impairment suffered by the Claimant was not long-term. Appeal allowed.
- cases
16/09/2019 23:31
-
Limoine v Sharma UKEAT/0094/19/RN
Appeal against the ET’s decision granting default judgment in the Respondent’s favour, minus the offset amount sought by the Claimant. Appeal allowed.
- cases
13/09/2019 10:37
-
Herry v Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council UKEAT/0069/19/LA
Appeal against the ET’s decision that the Claimant was not a disabled person, was not unfairly dismissed and was not the subject of unlawful victimisation. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
12/09/2019 12:50
-
Community Based Care Health Ltd v Narayan UKEAT/0162/18/JOJ
Appeal against the ET’s decision that the Claimant was a “worker” within s 230(3)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996 (“ERA”) and was not an “employee” under s 230(1) ERA. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
11/09/2019 10:52
