TULRA
-
RMT v Serco Ltd; ASLEF v London & Birmingham Railway Limited [2011] EWCA Civ 226
Linked appeals by two unions against interim injunctions preventing strike action by their members. Appeals allowed.
- cases
06/03/2011 11:15
-
Graff Diamonds Ltd v Boatwright UKEAT/0148/10/RN
Appeal against a ruling that the respondent had failed to comply with the requirements of TULRA and thus was liable to pay a protective award of 30 days to the claimant. Appeal by the claimant against the amount of the protective award. Both appeals allowed and remitted to the same Tribunal for a re-hearing.
- cases
01/03/2011 16:58
-
Nolan v United States of America [2010] EWCA Civ 1223
Appeal against an EAT ruling, in agreement with the ET, which rejected the respondent’s argument that, as a foreign sovereign government it had no obligation, in advance of a decision to close a military base, to consult with the civilian workforce about the reasons for its closure. A second appeal related to the remittance to the same Tribunal for a re-hearing on the question of the claimant’s entitlement to bring the claim. The Court of Appeal referred the main point to the ECJ.
- cases
14/11/2010 17:11
-
Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd v National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers [2010] EWHC 1084 (QB)
Application for interim injunction to prevent strike action on the grounds that the defendant's statutory notifications were insufficient, the ballot constituency was not properly established and the union did not provide a prompt notification of the result to its members. An injunction was granted.
- cases
28/06/2010 09:57
-
Shanahan v Unite the Union UKEAT/0411/09/DM
Appeal against decision by ET that the employer was in breach of its duty under section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (“TULRA”) by failing to consult with the appropriate trade union representatives when proposing to make more than 20 employees redundant. The employer also challenged the ET ruling that they should make a 90 day protected award to each of the employees who had been made redundant. Appeal in relation to breach of duty failed; appeal against the protected award succeeded and remitted back to the ET.
- cases
15/03/2010 15:05
