acas conciliation
-
Balcerzak v 1) George Birchall Service Ltd 2) Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy [2022] EAT 202
Appeal where a claim was rejected because the name of the respondent supposedly differed on the claim form and the ACAS EC certificate.
- cases
27/06/2023 10:13
-
Arvunescu v Quick Release (Automotive) Ltd [2022] EAT 26
Appeal against decision that a new claim was compromised by a COT3 settlement and that the claim should be struck out as having no reasonable chance of success.
- cases
16/02/2022 18:39
-
Adams & Others v Cornerstone Community Care: EA-2019-SCO-000111-SH
Judgment relating to an appeal against the rejection and reconsideration of a series of claim forms with incomplete early conciliation numbers.
- cases
26/09/2021 18:22
-
Adedeji v University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust [2021] EWCA Civ 23
Appeal against the dismissal of a claim which was held to be out of time. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
21/01/2021 12:03
-
Luton Borough Council v Haque UKEATPA/0260/17/JOJ
Appeal against a finding that the Claimant's claim was in time. The matter was remitted for a full hearing because of the need for clarity on time limits.
- cases
25/08/2017 13:37
-
Acas annual report published
Report covers 2015-16
- news
21/07/2016 08:36
-
Mist v Derby Community Health Services NHS Trust UKEAT/0170/15/MC
Appeal against a finding that claims against the Second Respondent were out of time and should be struck-out. Cross-appeal relating to the Claimant’s obligations under the pre-claim conciliation process and the Tribunal’s assumptions relating to the transfer of liabilities under TUPE. Appeal allowed and cross-appeal allowed in part.
- cases
24/01/2016 09:26
-
ET claim forms: getting it right - Case Round-Up: June 2015
In this month's round-up, Mark Shulman consultant solicitor with Keystone Law, looks at recent cases on practice and procedure relating to ET claim forms.
- resources
08/06/2015 10:35
-
Sterling v United Learning Trust UKEAT/0439/14/DM
Appeal against the rejection of the claimant’s claim because it was not lodged in time after having been rejected because of an incorrect ACAS certification number being entered on the ET1. Appeal dismissed.
- cases
07/05/2015 11:36
