This month's CPD questions relate to the following cases. Click the link to each case to access the questions.

[McCubbin v Perth & Kinross Council** ]()UKEATS/0025/13/BI
**Appeal against a decision made at a PHR that the respondent did not know and could not have known that the claimant was disabled. Appeal allowed and the question of what the respondent could reasonably be expected to have known was held over to the full hearing of the claim.

[Naeem v Secretary of State for Justice** ]()UKEAT/0215/13/RN
**Appeal against the dismissal of the claimant's claims of race discrimination and discrimination on the grounds of religion or belief. Cross-appeal against the finding that the other requisite elements of the definition of indirect discrimination had been made out. Appeal dismissed, cross-appeal allowed.

[Portnykh v Nomura International Plc** ]()UKEAT/0448/13/LA
**Appeal against a ruling that correspondence marked 'without prejudice' should be admissible in evidence at the ET. Appeal allowed.

[Anderson v Cheltenham & Gloucester Plc** ]()UKEAT/0221/13/BA
**Appeal against a costs order made against the successful claimant after she was awarded less than the Calderbank offer made by the respondent. Appeal allowed and costs order set aside.

For each question answered correctly 10 minutes of CPD is added to your training record so if you answer all 12 that will give you 2 hours.

Barristers: please note that, according to BSB rules, you will have to answer at least 3 questions correctly, equivalent to 30 minutes, for the training to count towards your CPD requirements.