<?xml version="1.0"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"><channel><title>Employment Cases Update</title><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk</link><description>RSS feed</description><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/5f385f0e991445ce8d7562b85ee17b4d.htm</guid><title>Bindi v Metropolitan Thames Valley [2026] EAT 136</title><description>Appeal against refusal to extend time for an appeal which had arrived by email two minutes late. </description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/bindi-v-metropolitan-thames-valley-2026-eat-136.5f385f0e991445ce8d7562b85ee17b4d.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 12:56:46 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/772a902ee9fe48c18099ed165e107675.htm</guid><title>Khans Solicitors v Kaiser [2026] EAT 137</title><description>Appeal concerning award of aggravated damages where the respondent was a firm of solicitors.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/khans-solicitors-v-kaiser-2026-eat-137.772a902ee9fe48c18099ed165e107675.htm</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 12:29:01 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/b0a9127eda2b4c4f8f6fbb7bf9e1c100.htm</guid><title>NSL Ltd v Bean [2026] EAT 132</title><description>Appeal by respondent where a long-serving employee with dyslexia had been dismissed for gross misconduct</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/nsl-ltd-v-bean-2026-eat-132.b0a9127eda2b4c4f8f6fbb7bf9e1c100.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 12:43:57 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/1fae9a06b641424fad9896ed251ac56a.htm</guid><title>Grantham v Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council [2026] EAT 135</title><description>Appeal against strike out of claims following failure to comply with an unless order</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/grantham-v-bournemouth-christchurch-and-poole-council-2026-eat-135.1fae9a06b641424fad9896ed251ac56a.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 10:54:12 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/504b7040ae064ebb8293a0f539afefb8.htm</guid><title>Muchererah v Rushcliffe Independent Hospitals (Kegworth) Ltd [2026] EAT 134</title><description>Appeal concerning whether or not the claimant had made protected disclosures</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/muchererah-v-rushcliffe-independent-hospitals-kegworth-ltd-2026-eat-134.504b7040ae064ebb8293a0f539afefb8.htm</link><pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2026 12:41:37 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/a739e098070b497895644bac84673f56.htm</guid><title>Talbot v (1) Costain Oil, Gas and Process Ltd (2) Costain Group PLC (3) Costain Ltd UKEAT/0283/16/LA</title><description>Appeal against rejection of discrimination claims by a female agency worker where the ET had found the allegations were not to do with her sex</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/talbot-v-1-costain-oil-gas-and-process-ltd-2-costain-group-plc-3-costain-ltd-ukeat-0283-16-la.a739e098070b497895644bac84673f56.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 13:53:19 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/f27cb6e2d21f4d73a941f9266fde0791.htm</guid><title>Pekacar v London Borough of Islington and Others [2026] EAT 125</title><description>Appeal against rejection of three allegations on the grounds they could not be discerned from the pleadings</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/pekacar-v-london-borough-of-islington-and-others-2026-eat-125.f27cb6e2d21f4d73a941f9266fde0791.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 10:31:34 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/a8d5819d6a2d400dbf2b09aa411f6f61.htm</guid><title>Kristensen v Portman Healthcare Ltd [2026] EAT 127</title><description>Appeal in unfair dismissal and protected disclosure claims </description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/kristensen-v-portman-healthcare-ltd-2026-eat-127.a8d5819d6a2d400dbf2b09aa411f6f61.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 14:05:47 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/84329d355c654562a87ba1dffd87c771.htm</guid><title>Singh Bhogal v National Education Union [2026] EAT 124</title><description /><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/singh-bhogal-v-national-education-union-2026-eat-124.84329d355c654562a87ba1dffd87c771.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 13:32:08 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/2bbf758aa32b4b87b6b3adcac360ee41.htm</guid><title>Furbacher v London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council [2026] EAT 117</title><description>Appeal over refusal to allow an amendment of the claim</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/furbacher-v-london-borough-of-barking-and-dagenham-council-2026-eat-117.2bbf758aa32b4b87b6b3adcac360ee41.htm</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 13:24:11 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/29bfbdecb84a46269bd9aca54ac32f8f.htm</guid><title>McAuley v Ethigen Ltd [2026] EAT 126</title><description>Appeal against decision to strike out a claim for conducting proceedings in a 'scandalous, unreasonable or vexatious manner'</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/mcauley-v-ethigen-ltd-2026-eat-126.29bfbdecb84a46269bd9aca54ac32f8f.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 10:03:56 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/93428d3d2c0e400a968b4359858b25db.htm</guid><title>Duffy v BXTR 3 LTD t/a House of Gods [2026] EAT 119</title><description>Appeal concerning application for interim relief in a possible whistleblowing claim</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/duffy-v-bxtr-3-ltd-t-a-house-of-gods-2026-eat-119.93428d3d2c0e400a968b4359858b25db.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 10:07:33 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/1c9c2367f23f411980fb316c09dfa850.htm</guid><title>1) Next Retail Ltd 2) Next Distribution Ltd v Thandi and others [2026] EAT 130</title><description>Judgment in equal pay litigation arising from pay differences between retail and warehouse staff</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/1-next-retail-ltd-2-next-distribution-ltd-v-thandi-and-others-2026-eat-130.1c9c2367f23f411980fb316c09dfa850.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 13:10:02 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/a7440064181f4233bc73c5cefa94a8d4.htm</guid><title>Devon and Somerset Fire and Rescue Authority v Hunt [2026] EAT 123</title><description>Appeal by employer against liability where the claimant had argued direct sex discrimination and unfair dismissal</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/devon-and-somerset-fire-and-rescue-authority-v-hunt-2026-eat-123.a7440064181f4233bc73c5cefa94a8d4.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 13:35:59 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/65c1fe8d0a0d4ae6a73dc20c8de890fe.htm</guid><title>Edward v North London NHS Foundation Trust [2026] EAT 116</title><description>Appeal concerning proper application of rule 64 and orders made by the tribunal where consent has been withdrawn </description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/edward-v-north-london-nhs-foundation-trust-2026-eat-116.65c1fe8d0a0d4ae6a73dc20c8de890fe.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 13:42:43 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/f9b3015e524b494dab240bf3f0079fd3.htm</guid><title>University of Bristol v Dr David Miller [2026] EAT 84</title><description>Appeal and cross appeal concerning liability and compensation</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/university-of-bristol-v-dr-david-miller-2026-eat-84.f9b3015e524b494dab240bf3f0079fd3.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 12:56:37 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/a5b889055ae04f228386d3027a4b94d2.htm</guid><title>AB v GH Ltd [2026] EAT 115</title><description>Appeal against dismissal of sexual harassment, constructive dismissal and victimisation claims and consideration of whether drunkenness negates consent</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/ab-v-gh-ltd-2026-eat-115.a5b889055ae04f228386d3027a4b94d2.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 14:12:12 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/0f246606b49640feb5c8208208823fe7.htm</guid><title>Badham v Jaguar Land Rover Ltd [2026] EAT 94</title><description>Appeal against the dismissal of the Claimant's claim of disability discrimination. Appeal dismissed.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/badham-v-jaguar-land-rover-ltd-2026-eat-94.0f246606b49640feb5c8208208823fe7.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 10:27:18 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/23d1df4a3b38478ba43ad23ebab94c5d.htm</guid><title>Augustine v Data Cars Limited [2026] UKSC 30</title><description>Appeal concerning the scope of the protection from unlawful discrimination afforded to part-time workers under the Part Time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000 </description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/augustine-v-data-cars-limited-2026-uksc-30.23d1df4a3b38478ba43ad23ebab94c5d.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:39:39 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/3cd6350a2e5c4213b65d5e7738a66e8c.htm</guid><title>Kumari v Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust [2026] EAT 111</title><description>Appeal against the refusal to recuse the EJ and lay members from a hearing which had been deconsolidated from another case. Appeal dismissed.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/kumari-v-leicestershire-partnership-nhs-trust-2026-eat-111.3cd6350a2e5c4213b65d5e7738a66e8c.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 09:43:13 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/82d1a2eac2f04853ab44e475806cfaff.htm</guid><title>Jeffery v Givaudan UK Ltd [2026] EAT 114</title><description>Appeal against the refusal to provide written reasons after the parties has settled via a COT3 agreement. Appeal allowed.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/jeffery-v-givaudan-uk-ltd-2026-eat-114.82d1a2eac2f04853ab44e475806cfaff.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 09:30:34 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/c160010650034a69b9e1b08cad5e218e.htm</guid><title>Day v East &amp; North Hertfordshire NHS Trust [2026] EAT 110</title><description>Appeal against a costs order made against the Claimant. Appeal allowed.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/day-v-east-north-hertfordshire-nhs-trust-2026-eat-110.c160010650034a69b9e1b08cad5e218e.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 10:00:26 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/d6b7412a6d30468bb7551b020686ac1b.htm</guid><title>Wolfe v Taka Mayfair Limited [2026] EAT 106</title><description>Appeal against the dismissal of the Claimant's amendment application, that the Respondent had not complied with section 10 of the Employment Relations Act 1999, as it would be bound to fail. Appeal dismissed.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/wolfe-v-taka-mayfair-limited-2026-eat-106.d6b7412a6d30468bb7551b020686ac1b.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 09:43:51 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/915bac1097ff4fadbafd1e9d1c9419fe.htm</guid><title>Waithaka v Barclays Execution Services Ltd [2026] EAT 105</title><description>Appeal against the dismissal of the Claimant's claims on the basis they had been brought outside the time limit and it was not just and equitable to extend time. Appeal allowed.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/waithaka-v-barclays-execution-services-ltd-2026-eat-105.915bac1097ff4fadbafd1e9d1c9419fe.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 16:22:49 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/3b6f8deeb2ef401bb5e7f11158d37150.htm</guid><title>London North Eastern Railway Ltd v Jiwanji &amp; Ors [2026] EAT 102</title><description>Appeal against an ET judgment awarding pay in the amount of £3,907 to each of approximately 1,250 of their employees in consequence of breach by their then employer of s.145B of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (“the 1992 Act”). Appeal dismissed.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/london-north-eastern-railway-ltd-v-jiwanji-ors-2026-eat-102.3b6f8deeb2ef401bb5e7f11158d37150.htm</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 09:43:50 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/3279d59bddb547f7b455718bcf7008b0.htm</guid><title>Saleh v Single track Systems Ltd [2026] EAT 104</title><description>Appeal against the dismissal of the Claimant's claim of constructive unfair dismissal. Appeal dismissed.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/saleh-v-single-track-systems-ltd-2026-eat-104.3279d59bddb547f7b455718bcf7008b0.htm</link><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 13:20:35 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/718d6a0b5ec64aee9fde3dfac4c88440.htm</guid><title>Harding v St George's University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2026] EAT 100</title><description>Appeal against the refusal by the ET to allow the Claimant to amend her notice of appeal to add a challenge to the limitation decision. Appeal dismissed.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/harding-v-st-georges-university-hospital-nhs-foundation-trust-2026-eat-100.718d6a0b5ec64aee9fde3dfac4c88440.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 09:31:02 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/1bf6172eb1034c8ebd8b3fca0700e236.htm</guid><title>Sheikholeslami v The University of Edinburgh [2026] EAT 96</title><description>Appeal against the ACAS uplift applied by the ET on remission and on its failure to gross up the award. Appeal dismissed.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/sheikholeslami-v-the-university-of-edinburgh-2026-eat-96.1bf6172eb1034c8ebd8b3fca0700e236.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 10:25:34 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/50cb02c7a64742448e471c836b96b311.htm</guid><title>Shah v Home Office: [2026] EAT 103</title><description>Appeals against dismissal of disability discrimination and victimisations claims</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/shah-v-home-office-2026-eat-103.50cb02c7a64742448e471c836b96b311.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 13:06:18 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/5401dbeaf51f42b587904f4f259a2da7.htm</guid><title>Xu v CARE (Christian Action Research and Education) and Others [2026] EAT 98</title><description>Appeal arising from applications to re-open claims of discrimination  and seek a wasted costs order when the claim had already been settled,</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/xu-v-care-christian-action-research-and-education-and-others-2026-eat-98.5401dbeaf51f42b587904f4f259a2da7.htm</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 13:55:08 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/87e47b5b5edc4c9c98e119deab0c6bd6.htm</guid><title>Zhao v Govia Thameslink Railway (GTR) Ltd: [2026] EAT 101</title><description>Appeal against dismissal of claim for unfair dismissal where the claimant had been dismissed for sending a discriminatory email</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/zhao-v-govia-thameslink-railway-gtr-ltd-2026-eat-101.87e47b5b5edc4c9c98e119deab0c6bd6.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 13:36:40 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/118796cf0f374a03942bcd2979f51924.htm</guid><title>Day v Health Education England [2026] EAT 97</title><description>Appeal against rejection of wasted costs orders application.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/day-v-health-education-england-2026-eat-97.118796cf0f374a03942bcd2979f51924.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 12:39:43 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/4a5d2ec4e4e04e8ba3fb0aca341e74d8.htm</guid><title>Leighton v Renfrewshire Council [2026] EAT 95</title><description>Appeal against dismissal of claim where the ET found there had been no protected act. </description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/leighton-v-renfrewshire-council-2026-eat-95.4a5d2ec4e4e04e8ba3fb0aca341e74d8.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 13:14:17 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/d8748b4b8ae24a6bba151086f3af9bf6.htm</guid><title>Young v Royal Mail Group Ltd [2026] EAT 93</title><description>Appeal against dismissal of claim for alleged trade union related activities</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/young-v-royal-mail-group-ltd-2026-eat-93.d8748b4b8ae24a6bba151086f3af9bf6.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 13:59:17 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/463d6e58f2d2461d891ea5ac3637ca59.htm</guid><title>Leedham v Royal Mail Group Ltd [2026] EAT 87</title><description>Appeal by claimant after the ET rejected his argument that electronic payslips did not meet the requirements of the ERA 1996  </description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/leedham-v-royal-mail-group-ltd-2026-eat-87.463d6e58f2d2461d891ea5ac3637ca59.htm</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 14:03:29 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/23712ad93fd64bf08e602f9a91ad10d7.htm</guid><title>Laffy v (1) WKCIC Group T/A Capital City College Group (2) Ms Odu [2026] EAT 90</title><description>Appeal that the ET should have reversed the burden of proof in a discrimination claim.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/laffy-v-1-wkcic-group-t-a-capital-city-college-group-2-ms-odu-2026-eat-90.23712ad93fd64bf08e602f9a91ad10d7.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 14:37:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/b499de4710bf4e9bb9f8e5ea40be1892.htm</guid><title>Jeffcoat v Hudson Business Centres Ltd [2026] EAT 91</title><description>Appeal from case management decision refusing amendment to include a claim for direct discrimination</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/jeffcoat-v-hudson-business-centres-ltd-2026-eat-91.b499de4710bf4e9bb9f8e5ea40be1892.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 14:05:59 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/9b9de3497e584464b5aa375fa9ed1f5c.htm</guid><title>Stephens v The Health and Safety Executive [2026] EAT 88</title><description>Appeal against dismissal of claims following withdrawal of the claim and a COT3</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/stephens-v-the-health-and-safety-executive-2026-eat-88.9b9de3497e584464b5aa375fa9ed1f5c.htm</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 14:18:04 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/ab8b7c34d3f74e8aac60c127293bbfaa.htm</guid><title>XX v YY [2026] EAT 89</title><description>Appeal against dismissal of wrongful dismissal claim where the claimant had been under duress while committing the act for which she was summarily dismissed</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/xx-v-yy-2026-eat-89.ab8b7c34d3f74e8aac60c127293bbfaa.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 11:12:21 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/13c0dda6f17b40de859af5c2961a9480.htm</guid><title>Costco Wholesale UK Limited v Nash [2026] EAT 85</title><description>Appeal against refusal to extend time for the respondent</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/costco-wholesale-uk-limited-v-nash-2026-eat-85.13c0dda6f17b40de859af5c2961a9480.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 13:45:43 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/96854c29e63241ffa45da37b8529eb00.htm</guid><title>(1) Di Fiore (2) Qadri v Introhive UK Ltd [2026] EAT 82</title><description>Appeal against refusal of a witness order </description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/1-di-fiore-2-qadri-v-introhive-uk-ltd-2026-eat-82.96854c29e63241ffa45da37b8529eb00.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 12:15:30 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/87a07309d1af438db0f0f6576c36c042.htm</guid><title>London Borough of Ealing &amp; Ors v Peace [2026] EAT 81</title><description>Appeal against case management decision adopting a list of issues</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/london-borough-of-ealing-ors-v-peace-2026-eat-81.87a07309d1af438db0f0f6576c36c042.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 13:05:20 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/62b18dce2c634220a51d15e0eda0b4a3.htm</guid><title>The Government of the State of Kuwait v Fenniche [2026] EAT 83</title><description>Appeals on time extensions involving state immunity</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/the-government-of-the-state-of-kuwait-v-fenniche-2026-eat-83.62b18dce2c634220a51d15e0eda0b4a3.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 12:54:07 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/e75937b27def483b810cb910b931eab9.htm</guid><title>Holmes v Kirklees Council [2026] EAT 80</title><description>Appeal where the claimant argued, in part, he had been automatically unfairly dismissed for his trade union activities. </description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/holmes-v-kirklees-council-2026-eat-80.e75937b27def483b810cb910b931eab9.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 13:27:21 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/6652e91501a64befb439fbf433985c0f.htm</guid><title>Chandrashekarappa v Wipro Limited [2026] EAT 73</title><description>Unlawful deductions proceedings where the claimant had been awarded a bonus that was subsequently capped. </description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/chandrashekarappa-v-wipro-limited-2026-eat-73.6652e91501a64befb439fbf433985c0f.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 13:25:50 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/a1249a7db40546a5be7e4b9f8326bd9e.htm</guid><title>London Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Garrett [2026] EAT 77</title><description>Appeal by resp0ndent against findings that the claimant did have a protected belief and had been subject to discrimination</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/london-ambulance-service-nhs-trust-v-garrett-2026-eat-77.a1249a7db40546a5be7e4b9f8326bd9e.htm</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 14:10:41 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/e7e42f8ac17a43d5970b89e096d306f5.htm</guid><title>Rogers v Secretary of State for Justice [2026] EAT 78</title><description>Appeal seeking time extension where the was a mistake filing the notice of appeal. </description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/rogers-v-secretary-of-state-for-justice-2026-eat-78.e7e42f8ac17a43d5970b89e096d306f5.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 13:12:13 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/a9403d2aacae4d20a06d28a6dbdda068.htm</guid><title>DHL Services Ltd v Ignatowicz [2026] EAT 74</title><description>Appeal by respondent that the contributory conduct of the claimant had been assessed too law and that he should not have to be reinstated.  </description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/dhl-services-ltd-v-ignatowicz-2026-eat-74.a9403d2aacae4d20a06d28a6dbdda068.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 13:30:15 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/43304d7b9ad944c7b644dbbb2f7c6acd.htm</guid><title>Komeng v National Highways Limited [2026] EAT 75</title><description>Appeal against dismissal of claims for unfair treatment of a fixed term employee and constructive dismissal </description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/komeng-v-national-highways-limited-2026-eat-75.43304d7b9ad944c7b644dbbb2f7c6acd.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 10:19:01 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/70562969d7b64c6fab49e87492689f7c.htm</guid><title>Foat v Department for Work and Pensions [2026] EAT 61</title><description>Appeal against various aspects of the remedy judgment and cross appeal against the grossing up of the future loss element. Appeal dismissed; cross appeal allowed.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/foat-v-department-for-work-and-pensions-2026-eat-61.70562969d7b64c6fab49e87492689f7c.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 09:42:32 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/a26c5f9d376e4fd59194a985c38478eb.htm</guid><title>Amin v (1) Manchester Airports Group PLC (2) Abbott [2026] EAT 63</title><description>Appeal against strike out of claims where the claimant had not paid deposit orders</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/amin-v-1-manchester-airports-group-plc-2-abbott-2026-eat-63.a26c5f9d376e4fd59194a985c38478eb.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 13:42:52 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/bb80853081254b1cbca8cc3656dc6ea3.htm</guid><title>Robinson v Harris and Others [2026] EAT 71</title><description>Appeal over dismissal of claims where the claimant felt the ET had misdirected itself over her employment status</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/robinson-v-harris-and-others-2026-eat-71.bb80853081254b1cbca8cc3656dc6ea3.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 13:36:30 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/8242e73a712e44449bf09846022e2cc3.htm</guid><title>Tedd v Surrey County Council [2026] EAT 66</title><description>Appeal against strike out of claims where the claimant had sought to mislead the tribunal over medical appointments</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/tedd-v-surrey-county-council-2026-eat-66.8242e73a712e44449bf09846022e2cc3.htm</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 13:04:40 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/cdc2c199782d4e248e7f94b72529ae96.htm</guid><title>Alexander v St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust: [2026] EAT 67</title><description>Appeal against dismissal of claims when the claimant's representative was too unwell to attend a hearing</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/alexander-v-st-georges-university-hospitals-nhs-foundation-trust-2026-eat-67.cdc2c199782d4e248e7f94b72529ae96.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 13:58:30 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/3e136ff08a324dcc8ee707d622300546.htm</guid><title>Clifton Diocese v Parker [2026] EAT 68</title><description>Appeal concerning whether the ET had erred in reversing the burden of proof in discrimination claims</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/clifton-diocese-v-parker-2026-eat-68.3e136ff08a324dcc8ee707d622300546.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 13:36:39 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/a120cf812e0641738fd7d8b6ad618dd2.htm</guid><title>Harkins v Marks &amp; Spencer Plc: [2026] EAT 70</title><description>Short judgment considering the very limited circumstances in which a respondent might make submissions at a Rule 3(10) Hearing</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/harkins-v-marks-spencer-plc-2026-eat-70.a120cf812e0641738fd7d8b6ad618dd2.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 13:48:56 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/8febd2e96bfc4dc29d6088a7f802034b.htm</guid><title>Chowdhury v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care [2026] EAT 69</title><description>Appeal of refusal to accept an appeal as out of time where the a hearing had been postponed due to illness</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/chowdhury-v-secretary-of-state-for-health-and-social-care-2026-eat-69.8febd2e96bfc4dc29d6088a7f802034b.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 13:36:46 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/c0d3ef028dc94d2b9da0d2d41fbbbe22.htm</guid><title>Ndow v University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust: [2026] EAT 64</title><description>Appeal concerning time limits in discrimination and unfair dismissal claims</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/ndow-v-university-hospitals-birmingham-nhs-foundation-trust-2026-eat-64.c0d3ef028dc94d2b9da0d2d41fbbbe22.htm</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 12:45:19 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/89c20ca52b4542c1bc061cbb5914f324.htm</guid><title>Lau v Dragon Cat Ltd T/A Dragon Cat Cafe &amp; Ors [2026] EAT 65</title><description>Time extension sought for submitting an answer to an appeal</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/lau-v-dragon-cat-ltd-t-a-dragon-cat-cafe-ors-2026-eat-65.89c20ca52b4542c1bc061cbb5914f324.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 13:00:06 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/ba544239886540028447ab24febb2227.htm</guid><title>Tarbuc v Martello Piling Ltd [2026] EAT 58</title><description>Appeal over whether a conversation around redundancy was protected by s111A of the Employment Rights Act</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/tarbuc-v-martello-piling-ltd-2026-eat-58.ba544239886540028447ab24febb2227.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 15:42:49 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/0ef0c3eca456429d980b2ca9c0419e2b.htm</guid><title>Bansal-McNulty v (1) Queens Park Rangers Football and Athletic Club Ltd (2) Yemms (3) Crawley Town Football and Social Club Ltd [2025] EAT 120</title><description>Appeal concerning disclosure of documents from disciplinary proceedings conducted by a regulatory body.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/bansal-mcnulty-v-1-queens-park-rangers-football-and-athletic-club-ltd-2-yemms-3-crawley-town-football-and-social-club-ltd-2025-eat-120.0ef0c3eca456429d980b2ca9c0419e2b.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 14:18:39 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/bd34bcb68f92489ba036056d16193f52.htm</guid><title>Capeling v TFX Group Ltd [2026] EAT 57</title><description>Appeal where the claimant was seeking to resurrect whistleblowing claims.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/capeling-v-tfx-group-ltd-2026-eat-57.bd34bcb68f92489ba036056d16193f52.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 13:50:59 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/09094955f8e7481584312ba62fd2d0c3.htm</guid><title>1) Ellard 2) Hulse 3) Warren v Alliance Transport Technologies Ltd (in Administration) [2025] EAT 169</title><description>Appeal by three claimants who had been refused a protective award when fellow employees made redundant 3 days later were subject to one. </description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/1-ellard-2-hulse-3-warren-v-alliance-transport-technologies-ltd-in-administration-2025-eat-169.09094955f8e7481584312ba62fd2d0c3.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 13:59:52 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/498ffa0317294ddea06d789074e6a667.htm</guid><title>Singha v Diamond DCO Two Ltd (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) [2025] EAT 203</title><description>Appeals by claimant against findings of disability status and dismissal of a victimisation complaint.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/singha-v-diamond-dco-two-ltd-in-creditors-voluntary-liquidation-2025-eat-203.498ffa0317294ddea06d789074e6a667.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 15:08:03 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>