<?xml version="1.0"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"><channel><title>Employment Cases Update</title><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk</link><description>RSS feed</description><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/3b6f8deeb2ef401bb5e7f11158d37150.htm</guid><title>London North Eastern Railway Ltd v Jiwanji &amp; Ors [2026] EAT 102</title><description>Appeal against an ET judgment awarding pay in the amount of £3,907 to each of approximately 1,250 of their employees in consequence of breach by their then employer of s.145B of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (“the 1992 Act”). Appeal dismissed.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/london-north-eastern-railway-ltd-v-jiwanji-ors-2026-eat-102.3b6f8deeb2ef401bb5e7f11158d37150.htm</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 09:43:50 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/3279d59bddb547f7b455718bcf7008b0.htm</guid><title>Saleh v Single track Systems Ltd [2026] EAT 104</title><description>Appeal against the dismissal of the Claimant's claim of constructive unfair dismissal. Appeal dismissed.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/saleh-v-single-track-systems-ltd-2026-eat-104.3279d59bddb547f7b455718bcf7008b0.htm</link><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 13:20:35 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/718d6a0b5ec64aee9fde3dfac4c88440.htm</guid><title>Harding v St George's University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2026] EAT 100</title><description>Appeal against the refusal by the ET to allow the Claimant to amend her notice of appeal to add a challenge to the limitation decision. Appeal dismissed.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/harding-v-st-georges-university-hospital-nhs-foundation-trust-2026-eat-100.718d6a0b5ec64aee9fde3dfac4c88440.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 09:31:02 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/d75df1ee967d4e36b95050bbd2382335.htm</guid><title>Shah v Home Office [2026] EAT 103</title><description>Appeal against the Claimant's s15 claim (discrimination arising from disability) and s27 victimisation claim. Appeal allowed.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/shah-v-home-office-2026-eat-103.d75df1ee967d4e36b95050bbd2382335.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 13:14:03 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/1bf6172eb1034c8ebd8b3fca0700e236.htm</guid><title>Sheikholeslami v The University of Edinburgh [2026] EAT 96</title><description>Appeal against the ACAS uplift applied by the ET on remission and on its failure to gross up the award. Appeal dismissed.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/sheikholeslami-v-the-university-of-edinburgh-2026-eat-96.1bf6172eb1034c8ebd8b3fca0700e236.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 10:25:34 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/50cb02c7a64742448e471c836b96b311.htm</guid><title>Shah v Home Office: [2026] EAT 103</title><description>Appeals against dismissal of disability discrimination and victimisations claims</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/shah-v-home-office-2026-eat-103.50cb02c7a64742448e471c836b96b311.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 13:06:18 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/5401dbeaf51f42b587904f4f259a2da7.htm</guid><title>Xu v CARE (Christian Action Research and Education) and Others [2026] EAT 98</title><description>Appeal arising from applications to re-open claims of discrimination  and seek a wasted costs order when the claim had already been settled,</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/xu-v-care-christian-action-research-and-education-and-others-2026-eat-98.5401dbeaf51f42b587904f4f259a2da7.htm</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 13:55:08 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/87e47b5b5edc4c9c98e119deab0c6bd6.htm</guid><title>Zhao v Govia Thameslink Railway (GTR) Ltd: [2026] EAT 101</title><description>Appeal against dismissal of claim for unfair dismissal where the claimant had been dismissed for sending a discriminatory email</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/zhao-v-govia-thameslink-railway-gtr-ltd-2026-eat-101.87e47b5b5edc4c9c98e119deab0c6bd6.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 13:36:40 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/118796cf0f374a03942bcd2979f51924.htm</guid><title>Day v Health Education England [2026] EAT 97</title><description>Appeal against rejection of wasted costs orders application.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/day-v-health-education-england-2026-eat-97.118796cf0f374a03942bcd2979f51924.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 12:39:43 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/4a5d2ec4e4e04e8ba3fb0aca341e74d8.htm</guid><title>Leighton v Renfrewshire Council [2026] EAT 95</title><description>Appeal against dismissal of claim where the ET found there had been no protected act. </description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/leighton-v-renfrewshire-council-2026-eat-95.4a5d2ec4e4e04e8ba3fb0aca341e74d8.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 13:14:17 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/d8748b4b8ae24a6bba151086f3af9bf6.htm</guid><title>Young v Royal Mail Group Ltd [2026] EAT 93</title><description>Appeal against dismissal of claim for alleged trade union related activities</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/young-v-royal-mail-group-ltd-2026-eat-93.d8748b4b8ae24a6bba151086f3af9bf6.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 13:59:17 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/463d6e58f2d2461d891ea5ac3637ca59.htm</guid><title>Leedham v Royal Mail Group Ltd [2026] EAT 87</title><description>Appeal by claimant after the ET rejected his argument that electronic payslips did not meet the requirements of the ERA 1996  </description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/leedham-v-royal-mail-group-ltd-2026-eat-87.463d6e58f2d2461d891ea5ac3637ca59.htm</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 14:03:29 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/23712ad93fd64bf08e602f9a91ad10d7.htm</guid><title>Laffy v (1) WKCIC Group T/A Capital City College Group (2) Ms Odu [2026] EAT 90</title><description>Appeal that the ET should have reversed the burden of proof in a discrimination claim.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/laffy-v-1-wkcic-group-t-a-capital-city-college-group-2-ms-odu-2026-eat-90.23712ad93fd64bf08e602f9a91ad10d7.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 14:37:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/b499de4710bf4e9bb9f8e5ea40be1892.htm</guid><title>Jeffcoat v Hudson Business Centres Ltd [2026] EAT 91</title><description>Appeal from case management decision refusing amendment to include a claim for direct discrimination</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/jeffcoat-v-hudson-business-centres-ltd-2026-eat-91.b499de4710bf4e9bb9f8e5ea40be1892.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 14:05:59 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/9b9de3497e584464b5aa375fa9ed1f5c.htm</guid><title>Stephens v The Health and Safety Executive [2026] EAT 88</title><description>Appeal against dismissal of claims following withdrawal of the claim and a COT3</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/stephens-v-the-health-and-safety-executive-2026-eat-88.9b9de3497e584464b5aa375fa9ed1f5c.htm</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 14:18:04 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/ab8b7c34d3f74e8aac60c127293bbfaa.htm</guid><title>XX v YY [2026] EAT 89</title><description>Appeal against dismissal of wrongful dismissal claim where the claimant had been under duress while committing the act for which she was summarily dismissed</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/xx-v-yy-2026-eat-89.ab8b7c34d3f74e8aac60c127293bbfaa.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 11:12:21 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/13c0dda6f17b40de859af5c2961a9480.htm</guid><title>Costco Wholesale UK Limited v Nash [2026] EAT 85</title><description>Appeal against refusal to extend time for the respondent</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/costco-wholesale-uk-limited-v-nash-2026-eat-85.13c0dda6f17b40de859af5c2961a9480.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 13:45:43 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/96854c29e63241ffa45da37b8529eb00.htm</guid><title>(1) Di Fiore (2) Qadri v Introhive UK Ltd [2026] EAT 82</title><description>Appeal against refusal of a witness order </description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/1-di-fiore-2-qadri-v-introhive-uk-ltd-2026-eat-82.96854c29e63241ffa45da37b8529eb00.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 12:15:30 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/87a07309d1af438db0f0f6576c36c042.htm</guid><title>London Borough of Ealing &amp; Ors v Peace [2026] EAT 81</title><description>Appeal against case management decision adopting a list of issues</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/london-borough-of-ealing-ors-v-peace-2026-eat-81.87a07309d1af438db0f0f6576c36c042.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 13:05:20 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/62b18dce2c634220a51d15e0eda0b4a3.htm</guid><title>The Government of the State of Kuwait v Fenniche [2026] EAT 83</title><description>Appeals on time extensions involving state immunity</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/the-government-of-the-state-of-kuwait-v-fenniche-2026-eat-83.62b18dce2c634220a51d15e0eda0b4a3.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 12:54:07 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/e75937b27def483b810cb910b931eab9.htm</guid><title>Holmes v Kirklees Council [2026] EAT 80</title><description>Appeal where the claimant argued, in part, he had been automatically unfairly dismissed for his trade union activities. </description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/holmes-v-kirklees-council-2026-eat-80.e75937b27def483b810cb910b931eab9.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 13:27:21 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/6652e91501a64befb439fbf433985c0f.htm</guid><title>Chandrashekarappa v Wipro Limited [2026] EAT 73</title><description>Unlawful deductions proceedings where the claimant had been awarded a bonus that was subsequently capped. </description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/chandrashekarappa-v-wipro-limited-2026-eat-73.6652e91501a64befb439fbf433985c0f.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 13:25:50 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/a1249a7db40546a5be7e4b9f8326bd9e.htm</guid><title>London Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Garrett [2026] EAT 77</title><description>Appeal by resp0ndent against findings that the claimant did have a protected belief and had been subject to discrimination</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/london-ambulance-service-nhs-trust-v-garrett-2026-eat-77.a1249a7db40546a5be7e4b9f8326bd9e.htm</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 14:10:41 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/e7e42f8ac17a43d5970b89e096d306f5.htm</guid><title>Rogers v Secretary of State for Justice [2026] EAT 78</title><description>Appeal seeking time extension where the was a mistake filing the notice of appeal. </description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/rogers-v-secretary-of-state-for-justice-2026-eat-78.e7e42f8ac17a43d5970b89e096d306f5.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 13:12:13 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/a9403d2aacae4d20a06d28a6dbdda068.htm</guid><title>DHL Services Ltd v Ignatowicz [2026] EAT 74</title><description>Appeal by respondent that the contributory conduct of the claimant had been assessed too law and that he should not have to be reinstated.  </description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/dhl-services-ltd-v-ignatowicz-2026-eat-74.a9403d2aacae4d20a06d28a6dbdda068.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 13:30:15 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/43304d7b9ad944c7b644dbbb2f7c6acd.htm</guid><title>Komeng v National Highways Limited [2026] EAT 75</title><description>Appeal against dismissal of claims for unfair treatment of a fixed term employee and constructive dismissal </description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/komeng-v-national-highways-limited-2026-eat-75.43304d7b9ad944c7b644dbbb2f7c6acd.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 10:19:01 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/70562969d7b64c6fab49e87492689f7c.htm</guid><title>Foat v Department for Work and Pensions [2026] EAT 61</title><description>Appeal against various aspects of the remedy judgment and cross appeal against the grossing up of the future loss element. Appeal dismissed; cross appeal allowed.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/foat-v-department-for-work-and-pensions-2026-eat-61.70562969d7b64c6fab49e87492689f7c.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 09:42:32 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/a26c5f9d376e4fd59194a985c38478eb.htm</guid><title>Amin v (1) Manchester Airports Group PLC (2) Abbott [2026] EAT 63</title><description>Appeal against strike out of claims where the claimant had not paid deposit orders</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/amin-v-1-manchester-airports-group-plc-2-abbott-2026-eat-63.a26c5f9d376e4fd59194a985c38478eb.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 13:42:52 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/bb80853081254b1cbca8cc3656dc6ea3.htm</guid><title>Robinson v Harris and Others [2026] EAT 71</title><description>Appeal over dismissal of claims where the claimant felt the ET had misdirected itself over her employment status</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/robinson-v-harris-and-others-2026-eat-71.bb80853081254b1cbca8cc3656dc6ea3.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 13:36:30 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/8242e73a712e44449bf09846022e2cc3.htm</guid><title>Tedd v Surrey County Council [2026] EAT 66</title><description>Appeal against strike out of claims where the claimant had sought to mislead the tribunal over medical appointments</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/tedd-v-surrey-county-council-2026-eat-66.8242e73a712e44449bf09846022e2cc3.htm</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 13:04:40 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/cdc2c199782d4e248e7f94b72529ae96.htm</guid><title>Alexander v St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust: [2026] EAT 67</title><description>Appeal against dismissal of claims when the claimant's representative was too unwell to attend a hearing</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/alexander-v-st-georges-university-hospitals-nhs-foundation-trust-2026-eat-67.cdc2c199782d4e248e7f94b72529ae96.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 13:58:30 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/3e136ff08a324dcc8ee707d622300546.htm</guid><title>Clifton Diocese v Parker [2026] EAT 68</title><description>Appeal concerning whether the ET had erred in reversing the burden of proof in discrimination claims</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/clifton-diocese-v-parker-2026-eat-68.3e136ff08a324dcc8ee707d622300546.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 13:36:39 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/a120cf812e0641738fd7d8b6ad618dd2.htm</guid><title>Harkins v Marks &amp; Spencer Plc: [2026] EAT 70</title><description>Short judgment considering the very limited circumstances in which a respondent might make submissions at a Rule 3(10) Hearing</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/harkins-v-marks-spencer-plc-2026-eat-70.a120cf812e0641738fd7d8b6ad618dd2.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 13:48:56 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/8febd2e96bfc4dc29d6088a7f802034b.htm</guid><title>Chowdhury v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care [2026] EAT 69</title><description>Appeal of refusal to accept an appeal as out of time where the a hearing had been postponed due to illness</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/chowdhury-v-secretary-of-state-for-health-and-social-care-2026-eat-69.8febd2e96bfc4dc29d6088a7f802034b.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 13:36:46 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/c0d3ef028dc94d2b9da0d2d41fbbbe22.htm</guid><title>Ndow v University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust: [2026] EAT 64</title><description>Appeal concerning time limits in discrimination and unfair dismissal claims</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/ndow-v-university-hospitals-birmingham-nhs-foundation-trust-2026-eat-64.c0d3ef028dc94d2b9da0d2d41fbbbe22.htm</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 12:45:19 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/89c20ca52b4542c1bc061cbb5914f324.htm</guid><title>Lau v Dragon Cat Ltd T/A Dragon Cat Cafe &amp; Ors [2026] EAT 65</title><description>Time extension sought for submitting an answer to an appeal</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/lau-v-dragon-cat-ltd-t-a-dragon-cat-cafe-ors-2026-eat-65.89c20ca52b4542c1bc061cbb5914f324.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 13:00:06 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/ba544239886540028447ab24febb2227.htm</guid><title>Tarbuc v Martello Piling Ltd [2026] EAT 58</title><description>Appeal over whether a conversation around redundancy was protected by s111A of the Employment Rights Act</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/tarbuc-v-martello-piling-ltd-2026-eat-58.ba544239886540028447ab24febb2227.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 15:42:49 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/0ef0c3eca456429d980b2ca9c0419e2b.htm</guid><title>Bansal-McNulty v (1) Queens Park Rangers Football and Athletic Club Ltd (2) Yemms (3) Crawley Town Football and Social Club Ltd [2025] EAT 120</title><description>Appeal concerning disclosure of documents from disciplinary proceedings conducted by a regulatory body.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/bansal-mcnulty-v-1-queens-park-rangers-football-and-athletic-club-ltd-2-yemms-3-crawley-town-football-and-social-club-ltd-2025-eat-120.0ef0c3eca456429d980b2ca9c0419e2b.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 14:18:39 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/bd34bcb68f92489ba036056d16193f52.htm</guid><title>Capeling v TFX Group Ltd [2026] EAT 57</title><description>Appeal where the claimant was seeking to resurrect whistleblowing claims.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/capeling-v-tfx-group-ltd-2026-eat-57.bd34bcb68f92489ba036056d16193f52.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 13:50:59 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/09094955f8e7481584312ba62fd2d0c3.htm</guid><title>1) Ellard 2) Hulse 3) Warren v Alliance Transport Technologies Ltd (in Administration) [2025] EAT 169</title><description>Appeal by three claimants who had been refused a protective award when fellow employees made redundant 3 days later were subject to one. </description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/1-ellard-2-hulse-3-warren-v-alliance-transport-technologies-ltd-in-administration-2025-eat-169.09094955f8e7481584312ba62fd2d0c3.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 13:59:52 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/498ffa0317294ddea06d789074e6a667.htm</guid><title>Singha v Diamond DCO Two Ltd (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) [2025] EAT 203</title><description>Appeals by claimant against findings of disability status and dismissal of a victimisation complaint.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/singha-v-diamond-dco-two-ltd-in-creditors-voluntary-liquidation-2025-eat-203.498ffa0317294ddea06d789074e6a667.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 15:08:03 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/3955266b4e744cafaddcb540635e117e.htm</guid><title>MacAusland Design Ltd v Portosi [2026] EAT 51</title><description>Appeal concerning whether the claimant, who had been unfairly dismissed, had mitigated her loss. </description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/macausland-design-ltd-v-portosi-2026-eat-51.3955266b4e744cafaddcb540635e117e.htm</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 09:55:26 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/ba869d2001de4305822dfdbad919391e.htm</guid><title>Manuel v Netduma LTD [2024] EAT 44</title><description>Appeal by claimant that a s44 claim was in his original ET1 and so should not have been dismissed.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/manuel-v-netduma-ltd-2024-eat-44.ba869d2001de4305822dfdbad919391e.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 15:36:40 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/f81d447f79014d619922dbd2b2a0d68f.htm</guid><title>The Employment Tribunal Remedies Handbook 2026-27 - digital edition update available now</title><description /><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/the-employment-tribunal-remedies-handbook-2026-27-digital-edition-update-available-now.f81d447f79014d619922dbd2b2a0d68f.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 08:37:23 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/b70d10efe16f4147bf6102f1a2a1aa45.htm</guid><title>Ikeji v Westminster City Council &amp; Anor [2026] EAT 62</title><description>Appeal against the imposition of a costs order against the Claimant. Appeal dismissed.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/ikeji-v-westminster-city-council-anor-2026-eat-62.b70d10efe16f4147bf6102f1a2a1aa45.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 09:59:01 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/d0a3aab5f35448de9b42a061e05b0c03.htm</guid><title>Halley v Smith and another [2026] EAT 56</title><description>Appeal against a ruling that the Claimant was neither an employee nor a worker and so could not bring a claim of discrimination. Appeal dismissed.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/halley-v-smith-and-another-2026-eat-56.d0a3aab5f35448de9b42a061e05b0c03.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 12:40:46 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/6e80d1db706949bd94ddcf3dcd522aed.htm</guid><title>Bickley v John Lewis Plc [2026] EAT 59</title><description>Appeal against the rejection of the Claimant's claim because the name on the EC certificate did not match that on the ET1 after a legal name change between the two events. Appeal allowed.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/bickley-v-john-lewis-plc-2026-eat-59.6e80d1db706949bd94ddcf3dcd522aed.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 11:23:07 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/90ed6c3af10649d58f06aac5a76066e2.htm</guid><title>QRS v London Borough of Tower Hamlets and others: [2026] EAT 60</title><description>Appeal against decision not to extend time in a request for a r3(10) hearing.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/qrs-v-london-borough-of-tower-hamlets-and-others-2026-eat-60.90ed6c3af10649d58f06aac5a76066e2.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 14:31:57 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/2fb8f35071a74cf28e1c7cb7b1afd7cf.htm</guid><title>Mulumba v 1) Partners Group (UK) Ltd 2) Partners Group (USA) Inc: [2026] EAT 53</title><description>Appeal against case management decision by ET to remove an issue and exclude passages of a statement from evidence at a final hearing
</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/mulumba-v-1-partners-group-uk-ltd-2-partners-group-usa-inc-2026-eat-53.2fb8f35071a74cf28e1c7cb7b1afd7cf.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 14:03:16 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/1bcd7558d9164db9b174b197430d2112.htm</guid><title>Harper v Alliance Healthcare Management Services [2026] EAT 55</title><description>Appeal against the dismissal of the Claimants' claim of unlawful deductions. Appeal dismissed.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/harper-v-alliance-healthcare-management-services-2026-eat-55.1bcd7558d9164db9b174b197430d2112.htm</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 09:09:27 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/82e84a028a794850874544c6a137c8fe.htm</guid><title>National Crime Agency v DP and others [2026] EAT 52</title><description>Judgment considering the proper construction and application of Section 56 Investigatory Powers Act 2016 in an employment law context.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/national-crime-agency-v-dp-and-others-2026-eat-52.82e84a028a794850874544c6a137c8fe.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 09:42:52 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/4112176291a34da79041a43ffc0849f8.htm</guid><title>Wirral University Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust v Moriarty [2026] EAT 48</title><description>Appeal against the refusal to strike out the Claimant's claims where the Respondent argued that the Claimant's grounds amounted to an abuse of the process in accordance with the principle established in Henderson v Henderson. Appeal dismissed.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/wirral-university-teaching-hospitals-nhs-foundation-trust-v-moriarty-2026-eat-48.4112176291a34da79041a43ffc0849f8.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 09:22:04 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/fa758a32e10e4f85a062d101f7544c70.htm</guid><title>Boateng v Moss Bros Group Limited [2026] EAT 50</title><description>Appeals against the striking out of discrimination claims and against the refusal to stay other proceedings pending the appeal against the strike out. Appeals dismissed.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/boateng-v-moss-bros-group-limited-2026-eat-50.fa758a32e10e4f85a062d101f7544c70.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 10:38:59 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/d57e84d361ab46c7acb2e35f2e9c7de9.htm</guid><title>New Vento bands from 6 April 2026</title><description>New Vento bands for injury to feelings and psychiatric injury have been released by the Presidents of England &amp; Wales and Scotland.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/new-vento-bands-from-6-april-2026.d57e84d361ab46c7acb2e35f2e9c7de9.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 10:13:02 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/6465dce877284a278cd29deebaed4635.htm</guid><title>K J v British Council [2026] EAT 46</title><description>Appeal and cross appeal against decisions relating to remedy and jurisdiction. Appeal allowed in part; cross appeal dismissed.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/k-j-v-british-council-2026-eat-46.6465dce877284a278cd29deebaed4635.htm</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 10:18:55 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/b02f7a0503ec43e79124d82bdb624f90.htm</guid><title>Pasha v The Home Office [2026] EAT 42</title><description>Appeal against the dismissal of the Claimant's claim of unfair dismissal. Appeal dismissed.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/pasha-v-the-home-office-2026-eat-42.b02f7a0503ec43e79124d82bdb624f90.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 09:51:42 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/f8e15157ebeb46e682fc4d480c14dda4.htm</guid><title>Adamu v The Kingsdale Foundation [2026] EAT 40</title><description>Appeal against the dismissal of the Claimant's claim of unlawful deductions. Appeal dismissed.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/adamu-v-the-kingsdale-foundation-2026-eat-40.f8e15157ebeb46e682fc4d480c14dda4.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 09:36:15 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/6019b77754d44862a1893f2be85b9dd3.htm</guid><title>Whitaker v White Rose Academies Trust &amp; Luminate Education Group [2026] EAT 43</title><description>Appeal against a finding that the Claimant was not a worker of the Second Respondent. Appeal dismissed.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/whitaker-v-white-rose-academies-trust-luminate-education-group-2026-eat-43.6019b77754d44862a1893f2be85b9dd3.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 09:15:26 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/7b4e7e1822f94a3db73c7ec6b3e888ca.htm</guid><title>A v (1) Organisation (2) C (3) D [2026] EAT 35</title><description>Appeal against the refusal to revoke or amend an RRO. Appeal allowed.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/a-v-1-organisation-2-c-3-d-2026-eat-35.7b4e7e1822f94a3db73c7ec6b3e888ca.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 16:19:53 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/abc1914ed49a446d83efb8d87b184e76.htm</guid><title>The Laurels Family Assessment Ltd v Kay [2026] EAT 39</title><description>Appeal against a decision that the Claimant had been automatically unfairly dismissed for making protected disclosures. Appeal dismissed.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/the-laurels-family-assessment-ltd-v-kay-2026-eat-39.abc1914ed49a446d83efb8d87b184e76.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 16:01:56 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/e2f7bbafc8f24f888dc11a51b84784e5.htm</guid><title>Olarewaju v Bupa Care Services Limited [2026] EAT 38</title><description>Appeal against the refusal of the Claimant's application for interim relief. Appeal dismissed.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/olarewaju-v-bupa-care-services-limited-2026-eat-38.e2f7bbafc8f24f888dc11a51b84784e5.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 15:45:07 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/b1c037a265804d2680d2de8b799da3e4.htm</guid><title>Employment Rights (Increase of limits) Order 2026</title><description>New limits for compensation, weekly pay for redundancy and other rates. In force from 6 April 2026.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/employment-rights-increase-of-limits-order-2026.b1c037a265804d2680d2de8b799da3e4.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 11:07:32 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/ae56239050034928991b7fbe9163eeba.htm</guid><title>Guy’s &amp; St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust v Mamode [2026] EAT 37</title><description>Appeal against a finding that the Claimant had been constructively dismissed. Appeal allowed.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/guy-s-st-thomas-nhs-foundation-trust-v-mamode-2026-eat-37.ae56239050034928991b7fbe9163eeba.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 13:47:03 +0000</pubDate></item><item><guid>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/e98f62f2a1d54fee95ddcc272fa72c13.htm</guid><title>Matovu v The Chambers of Mr Martin Porter KC &amp; Ors [2026] EAT 36</title><description>Appeal against decisions made in relation to the amendment of the Claimant's particulars of claim. Appeal allowed.</description><link>https://employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/content/matovu-v-the-chambers-of-mr-martin-porter-kc-ors-2026-eat-36.e98f62f2a1d54fee95ddcc272fa72c13.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 11:49:35 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>